February 25, 2019 | New York Law Journal
Loss of Trademark: A Franchisor's Worst NightmareIn his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff discusses 'Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd. v. McDonald's Intellectual Property Company, Ltd.' in which the Cancellation Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office concluded that McDonald's had abandoned the BIG MAC mark and thus the mark should be cancelled.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
6 minute read
November 19, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Upcoming Review of the Franchise Disclosure Rule: Here We Go AgainFranchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff discusses the recent proposal to change the state cover page of the Franchise Disclosure Document and suggests that the review may not result in many significant changes.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
7 minute read
September 17, 2018 | New York Law Journal
No-Poaching and Non-Compete Provisions: Long-Time Practices Go Under the MicroscopeFranchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff discusses a new employment issue that is taking center stage—the subject of employee “poaching” in the franchising context.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
9 minute read
June 04, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Recent Noncompete, Trademark Infringement and Nonsignatory Franchise PrecedentsDuring the last 12 months or so, franchise precedents rendered in the areas of covenants of noncompetition and trademark infringement have been numerous.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
1 minute read
February 27, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Would a Franchise Lawyer Make a Good Franchisee?In his Franchising column, Rupert Barkoff discusses the pros and cons of whether a franchise lawyer would make a good (or bad) franchisee. On the one hand, they may "be more likely to understand the significance of a franchise agreement," but on the other, they may "be fixed in their ways and not easily convinced that the franchisor's system must be followed in order to achieve success."
By Rupert M. Barkoff
8 minute read
November 17, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Joint Employer Liability in the United States and AustraliaFranchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff writes: Why is the New York Law Journal publishing an article on the joint employer liability issue in the United States and Australia? Because this issue, which has been THE hot issue in U.S. franchise law for several years, has also shown its face in Australia during this period, and is now the headline legal issue in Australian franchising as well.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
10 minute read
August 28, 2017 | New York Law Journal
The Changing Face of FranchisingFranchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff discusses the changing franchisee population, with the growth of multi-unit, and in some cases, multi-system franchisees; the changing values and business objectives as professional businesspersons take over; and of course, changing technology.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
13 minute read
May 26, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Franchisees Sitting on My Board? Never!Franchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff writes: There are many situations today where a group or a constituency wants to make sure that it has a voice at the decision-making table by having a representative on its franchisor's board of directors—a so-called "constituency director." Is this a good or bad idea?
By Rupert M. Barkoff
20 minute read
November 29, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Joint Employer Liability for Franchisors After the Obama EraFranchising columnist Rupert M. Barkoff discusses prospects for joint employer liability for franchisors after the Obama era, the hottest issue in franchise law over the last few years. Joint employer liability could occur when an employee could claim that he or she had not one, but two, employers -- one begin the franchisor and the other the franchisee.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
15 minute read
August 29, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Enforcing Termination Obligations of Franchise AgreementsIn his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes about termination of franchise agreements where the franchisor has the right to demand, among other things, that the franchisee de-identify, not compete, assign the phone number of the former franchisee to franchisor, and return its confidential operating manuals, and what happens when the franchisee refuses to comply with these obligations. In one case, a drastic remedy was imposed.
By Rupert M. Barkoff
18 minute read
Trending Stories