NEXT

Rupert M Barkoff

Rupert M Barkoff

May 27, 2016 | New York Law Journal

Franchise Documents Should Not Be Cookie Cutter Products

Rupert M. Barkoff while Franchise Documents can be easily prepared by copycatting existing documents used by other franchisors, this overlooks the fact that this cookie-cutter approach is not likely to be successful when the franchise systems are not virtually identical. Copycatting will be less effective when the franchise systems are in different industries, but even when the systems are similar, there are other reasons not to use a copycat approach.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

10 minute read

February 25, 2016 | New York Law Journal

Prophylactic Preparation for a Business Judgment Rule Defense

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes: While the business judgment rule may trace its origin back to corporate law, it seems neatly transportable into the area of franchise law. Just like a corporation deciding how to manage its business, so, too, does a franchisor need to bob and weave when strategically managing the direction in which the franchisor will head. The rule, if enforced, allows franchise companies to make decisions without fear of being excessively scrutinized.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

10 minute read

December 02, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Hidden and Creeping Franchise Fees: Old Lessons Worth Remembering

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes that a recent discussion on the ABA's Forum on Franchising Listserv brought to mind an earlier situation where payments made for extra copies of a manual were viewed as the payment of a franchisee fee, which transformed a distribution agreement into a franchise arrangement, a company into an accidental franchisor, and what might have been an allowable termination into a $1.5 million damage award.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

9 minute read

December 01, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Hidden and Creeping Franchise Fees: Old Lessons Worth Remembering

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes that a recent discussion on the ABA's Forum on Franchising Listserv brought to mind an earlier situation where payments made for extra copies of a manual were viewed as the payment of a franchisee fee, which transformed a distribution agreement into a franchise arrangement, a company into an accidental franchisor, and what might have been an allowable termination into a $1.5 million damage award.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

9 minute read

September 15, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Ruling in Canada Places Heavy Obligations on Franchisors

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff discusses the battle being waged in Canada between Dunkin' Donuts franchisees and their franchisor. He writes: The essence of the franchisees' claim was whether the franchisor had fulfilled its obligations to its franchisees—a simple issue, it would appear. However, that turned out not to be the case.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

12 minute read

September 14, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Ruling in Canada Places Heavy Obligations on Franchisors

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff discusses the battle being waged in Canada between Dunkin' Donuts franchisees and their franchisor. He writes: The essence of the franchisees' claim was whether the franchisor had fulfilled its obligations to its franchisees—a simple issue, it would appear. However, that turned out not to be the case.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

12 minute read

March 17, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Is It Time to Rebuild the U.S. Franchise Regulatory System?

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes that while the rest of the world, including franchising, has been dynamic and constantly changing, franchise regulation has been, essentially, static since 1979. Those favoring stability in regulation might argue that the absence of change has been good for franchising. A static environment is not, by its nature, bad. However, this assumes that the existing regulatory scheme is effective.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

10 minute read

March 16, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Is It Time to Rebuild the U.S. Franchise Regulatory System?

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes that while the rest of the world, including franchising, has been dynamic and constantly changing, franchise regulation has been, essentially, static since 1979. Those favoring stability in regulation might argue that the absence of change has been good for franchising. A static environment is not, by its nature, bad. However, this assumes that the existing regulatory scheme is effective.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

10 minute read

December 23, 2014 | New York Law Journal

The Failure of Franchising and Academia to Intersect

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes: If law schools want to be relevant in the process of creating good lawyers with real world experience, they should consider offering a course in franchising law as one avenue to enhance the experience they provide to their students.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

9 minute read

September 15, 2014 | New York Law Journal

Is the Franchising Business Model in Serious Trouble?

In his Franchising column, Rupert M. Barkoff writes: Today, with the multiple recent legislative and judicial non-franchisor favorable developments relating to franchising, many are saying that the franchise model is headed for trouble. But others disagree. Some recent developments could mark the beginning of a period of change, and one that will clearly not be beneficial for franchisors; it may not be so favorable to some franchisees in the long run, either.

By Rupert M. Barkoff

12 minute read