Scott E Mollen

November 17, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews 'Trump Village v. Bezvoleva,' where the court found that a defamation claim brought by a co-op president against defendant shareholders was allowed to proceed; and 'MID Bronx HDFC v. Paulino,' where a tenant was denied dismissal of her landlord's nuisance holdover proceeding.

By Scott E. Mollen

15 minute read

November 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews 'Galil Kineret v. Chin', '229 West 113th Street v. Lamb', and 'New York Shun on Realty Development v. Mathieu'.

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read

November 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews 'Galil Kineret v. Chin', '229 West 113th Street v. Lamb', and 'New York Shun on Realty Development v. Mathieu'.

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read

October 28, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews 'Airport Mart v. Westchester County', where the court found that the tenant lacked standing to challenge Westchester's determination to terminate a license agreement; and 'Nalea Realty v. Quinonez', a case involving a claim of identity theft where the court found that notable differences in signatures cast doubt on the plaintiff/landlord's claim for breach of lease.

By Scott E. Mollen

15 minute read

October 27, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews 'Airport Mart v. Westchester County', where the court found that the tenant lacked standing to challenge Westchester's determination to terminate a license agreement; and 'Nalea Realty v. Quinonez', a case involving a claim of identity theft where the court found that notable differences in signatures cast doubt on the plaintiff/landlord's claim for breach of lease.

By Scott E. Mollen

15 minute read

October 21, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews "Faison v. Lewis," where the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether a plaintiff's claim, which sought to set aside and cancel a defendant bank's mortgage on the grounds that the money had been lent in reliance on a forged deed, was time-barred; and "Howard Avenue Development v. Richardson," where it was found that the subject license agreement provisions were akin to a lease.

By Scott E. Mollen

15 minute read

October 14, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews a decision where the court, balancing equities, restored a previously incarcerated tenant to his former premises, and a second holding where it was found that the tenant had no legal basis to reject default notices sent by an agent on the landlord's behalf.

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read

October 13, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews a decision where the court, balancing equities, restored a previously incarcerated tenant to his former premises, and a second holding where it was found that the tenant had no legal basis to reject default notices sent by an agent on the landlord's behalf.

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read

October 07, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews '111 Hudson St. Condominium v. 111 Hudson St,' where condominium owners were allowed to proceed with their breach of contract claims against the sponsor and its members, and 'Clemente v. Liberato,' where the court declined to dismiss the petitioner's licensee holdover suit, stating that it saw "no inherent reasons why a family member could not simultaneously have licensee status."

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read

October 06, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews '111 Hudson St. Condominium v. 111 Hudson St,' where condominium owners were allowed to proceed with their breach of contract claims against the sponsor and its members, and 'Clemente v. Liberato,' where the court declined to dismiss the petitioner's licensee holdover suit, stating that it saw "no inherent reasons why a family member could not simultaneously have licensee status."

By Scott E. Mollen

12 minute read