Scott E Mollen

August 26, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews "Peters v. Smolian," a case involving claims concerning a right of first refusal embodied in various deeds.

By Scott E. Mollen

10 minute read

August 25, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews "Peters v. Smolian," a case involving claims concerning a right of first refusal embodied in various deeds.

By Scott E. Mollen

10 minute read

August 19, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews "860 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Ender," where the landlord was barred by the statute of limitations from bringing a holdover action against lessee; and "Lakeland Bank v. Neziri," dealing with an equitable mortgage.

By Scott E. Mollen

11 minute read

August 18, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews "860 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Ender," where the landlord was barred by the statute of limitations from bringing a holdover action against lessee; and "Lakeland Bank v. Neziri," dealing with an equitable mortgage.

By Scott E. Mollen

11 minute read

August 12, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews cases involving a landlord-tenant dispute over a duplex's remediation after it was water damaged, attorney fees under a commercial lease, and development rights under RPAPL §1602.

By Scott E. Mollen

14 minute read

August 11, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews cases involving a landlord-tenant dispute over a duplex's remediation after it was water damaged, attorney fees under a commercial lease, and development rights under RPAPL §1602.

By Scott E. Mollen

14 minute read

August 05, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews '265 West 34th Street v. Chung,' where a landlord sufficiently stated a claim to pierce the corporate veil; and 'Board of Managers of the Carlyle at Lawrence Condominium v. Fortuna Fries,' where a scrivener's error of notice of lien misidentified the fee owner.

By Scott E. Mollen

13 minute read

August 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews '265 West 34th Street v. Chung,' where a landlord sufficiently stated a claim to pierce the corporate veil; and 'Board of Managers of the Carlyle at Lawrence Condominium v. Fortuna Fries,' where a scrivener's error of notice of lien misidentified the fee owner.

By Scott E. Mollen

13 minute read

July 29, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews 'Multi Capital Group v. Karasick,' where a developer's $2 million finder's fee was determined invalid; and 'Bank of America v. Maeder,' a foreclosure action where the court held that ownership of a note may be established by an undated endorsement in blank.

By Scott E. Mollen

14 minute read

July 28, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Scott E. Mollen reviews 'Multi Capital Group v. Karasick,' where a developer's $2 million finder's fee was determined invalid; and 'Bank of America v. Maeder,' a foreclosure action where the court held that ownership of a note may be established by an undated endorsement in blank.

By Scott E. Mollen

14 minute read