NEXT

Stephen M. Kramarsky

Stephen M. Kramarsky

Stephen M. Kramarsky is a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky. His practice focuses on complex commercial and intellectual property litigation.

March 25, 2019 | New York Law Journal

Crafting Enforceable Electronic Agreements: EDNY Examines Arbitration Clause in 'Sultan v. Coinbase'

Intellectual Property columnist Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent decision which offers some good guidance for anyone trying to design an enforceable electronic contract process.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

9 minute read

January 14, 2019 | New York Law Journal

Reseller Beware: Digital Media Files and the First Sale Doctrine 

Intellectual Property columnist Stephen M. Kramarsky writes: New technologies, and the business models that accompany them, often create challenges for existing law, and nowhere is that friction more evident than where digital content bumps into the federal copyright law intended to regulate it. He discusses a recent Second Circuit case involving an online marketplace for digital used music and other used digital content, which posed such challenges.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

10 minute read

September 17, 2018 | New York Law Journal

Making a Spectacle of Making Spectacles

Intellectual Property columnist Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a case in which the court examined improper use of confidential information for business evaluation.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

10 minute read

May 21, 2018 | New York Law Journal

Court Examines Theft of Computer Code in 'Aleynikov'

Technological advances, for all the good they bring to the world, often bring with them significant challenges for existing legal structures.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky and John Millson

10 minute read

March 19, 2018 | New York Law Journal

Fairly Unpredictable: Second Circuit Reverses District Court's Finding of Fair Use in 'Fox News Network v. TVEyes'

Intellectual Property columnist Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses 'Fox News Network v. TVEyes'. As this case makes clear, the boundaries of the fair use doctrine are murky, and even the courts don't always agree about what is permissible.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

10 minute read

November 20, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Court Considers Victims' Right to Sue Over Data Breach

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent decision from the Southern District of New York that examines that balance and the scope of a company's duty to protect the sensitive information of its employees and customers.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

11 minute read

September 18, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Browser Beware: Second Circuit Sizes Up 'Reasonable Smartphone User' in Uber Dispute

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky writes: In a recent case in the Southern District of New York against ride-hailing company Uber and its CEO, the court denied Uber's motion to compel arbitration, holding that its sign-up process did not adequately notify users of its terms of service (which contained the arbitration provision). The Second Circuit's review and vacatur of that decision examines these issues in the context of the "reasonable smartphone user," and it is worth a closer look.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

21 minute read

July 17, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Drake Infringement Case: Fair Use as a Matter of Law

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky writes: Though once chaotic, the legal environment for sampling (at least in the U.S. music industry) has settled into a well-understood legal regime, with rigorous clearance and licensing practices becoming the industry norm. Nevertheless, as a recent case involving musician Drake shows, there are always edge cases, and litigation does arise. With the meteoric rise of shared and repurposed content in social media and other digital contexts, those cases are likely to be more and more common.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

10 minute read

May 22, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Court Denies ISP Declaratory Relief on DMCA Protection

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent case in which an ISP essentially asked the court to give it legal advice: whether the DMCA applied to it, and whether it was required to respond to certain kinds of DMCA take-down notices. The court grappled with the question of whether it had the power to grant this kind of relief, and its carefully considered opinion provides some interesting insight into the current landscape of copyright protection under the DMCA.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

19 minute read

March 20, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Protecting Opinion in Twitter's 'Schoolyard Squabbles'

Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, discusses the opinion in 'Jacobus v. Trump', writing: In defamation law, a false statement of fact may be actionable; but a statement of opinion, no matter how offensive, generally is not. The opinion in 'Jacobus' is an excellent example of how complicated that analysis has become in the era of pervasive digital information.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

15 minute read