Stephen M. Kramarsky

September 22, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent Second Circuit decision that offers an opportunity to examine the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, its function and limitations, and its utility as a tool for protecting electronic assets.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

12 minute read

September 21, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent Second Circuit decision that offers an opportunity to examine the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, its function and limitations, and its utility as a tool for protecting electronic assets.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

12 minute read

July 21, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent S.D.N.Y. opinion on attorney fees after the trial between the Beastie Boys and beverage producer Monster Energy Company, which sheds some valuable light on how courts can decide complex fee questions.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

13 minute read

July 20, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent S.D.N.Y. opinion on attorney fees after the trial between the Beastie Boys and beverage producer Monster Energy Company, which sheds some valuable light on how courts can decide complex fee questions.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

13 minute read

May 26, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes: A recent decision tackled the issue of service of process through a private Facebook message, and did so in a surprisingly direct and uncompromising manner.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

12 minute read

May 22, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes: A recent decision tackled the issue of service of process through a private Facebook message, and did so in a surprisingly direct and uncompromising manner.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

12 minute read

March 17, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, discusses a recent Eastern District case that demonstrates the difficult questions raised by "clickwrap" and "browsewrap" agreements.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

14 minute read

March 16, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, discusses a recent Eastern District case that demonstrates the difficult questions raised by "clickwrap" and "browsewrap" agreements.

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

14 minute read

January 20, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses 'Dorchester', which presented the SDNY with a question of first impression: May a litigant dispose of a hard drive that might contain relevant, discoverable information if that hard drive has "crashed?" If not, what is the appropriate sanction for doing so?

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

13 minute read

January 16, 2015 | New York Law Journal

In his column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses 'Dorchester', which presented the SDNY with a question of first impression: May a litigant dispose of a hard drive that might contain relevant, discoverable information if that hard drive has "crashed?" If not, what is the appropriate sanction for doing so?

By Stephen M. Kramarsky

13 minute read