October 21, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Dispute on 'Implicit' Term Insufficient to Preclude EnforcementThis article discusses the potential risks companies face when working with renegotiation of settlement agreements. "plaintiffs Javelin Global Commodities (UK) Ltd. and Bluegrass Commodities LP sued defendant Lexington Coal Company, and its affiliates, under two different contracts: (i) a contract between Bluegrass and Lexington granting Bluegrass the exclusive right to market and sell thermal coal; and (ii) a contract between Javelin and Lexington for the sale of metallurgical coal to Javelin."
By Thomas E.L. Dewey and Edward Lee
7 minute read
October 18, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Lack of Agreement on 'Implicit' Settlement Term Insufficient to Preclude Enforcement'Javelin' is a reminder of both the limited scope of FRE 408 and the pitfalls that accompany any renegotiation of a settlement agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
7 minute read
July 03, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Proposed Settlement of Securities Class Action Concerning Alleged Bribery Scheme Approved as 'Fair and Reasonable'In 'In re Tenaris S.A. Securities Litigation', Judge Kiyo Matsumoto found that the proposed settlement satisfied both procedural and substantive fairness. As to procedural fairness, the court found that the settlement resulted from arm's-length negotiations enhanced by substantial discovery and that lead plaintiffs and lead counsel had adequately represented the settlement class because they had engaged in "vigorous advocacy" on its behalf.
By Thomas E. L. Dewey
11 minute read
April 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Proposed Settlement of Claims Arising from Sale of Stuyvesant Town Property Approved as 'Fair and Reasonable'In 2010, the former owners of the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town property defaulted on their mortgage. Five years later, that property was sold at a profit that paid off outstanding principal and interest. Litigation then ensued over the allocation and distribution of certain excess proceeds from the sale.
By Thomas E. L. Dewey
11 minute read
February 15, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Settlement Agreement Enforceable in Absence of Written AgreementWhile working toward a settlement, it is common for parties to email proposed terms and settlement amounts without necessarily expecting that their communications will be enforceable. 'Elysium Health v. ChromaDex' illustrates that settlement terms can be enforceable without a formal, executed agreement if the parties express mutual assent and intention to be bound.
By Thomas E. L. Dewey
7 minute read
October 13, 2023 | New York Law Journal
No Breach of Settlement Agreement Where Text of Unsigned Draft Agreement Indicated Execution Was RequiredA decision out of the Southern District of New York addresses what happens when parties to a dispute negotiate a draft settlement agreement, one party makes changes to the draft, the other party accepts those changes and requests a signature, but the party who had proposed the changes doesn't sign the document.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
10 minute read
July 07, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Oral Agreement to Settle at Mediation and Follow-Up Email Insufficient for EnforcementNew York practitioners are likely aware that not all enforceable settlements are reduced to a formal settlement agreement executed by all parties; courts may in some circumstances enforce a settlement agreement even if the parties failed to execute a formal written agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
7 minute read
April 14, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Lack of Agreement on the Term 'Implicit' Insufficient To Preclude EnforcementIn his Settlement and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses the case 'Garmashov v. United States Parachute Association,' which he uses as a"reminder to practitioners and clients alike that, if a party's agreement to settle is contingent on a yet-to-be resolved settlement term, that position must be communicated explicitly and frequently."
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
8 minute read
February 16, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Tentative Settlement Agreement Unenforceable Without Intent to Be BoundContributor Thomas E.L. Dewey notes that courts will not enforce a draft settlement agreement that contains terms evincing an intent to be bound only upon formal execution, nor will they ignore the fact that parties had significant points of contention standing in the way of a final agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
6 minute read
October 14, 2022 | New York Law Journal
No Breach of Settlement Agreement Where Conduct Not Prohibited by Non-Disparagement Clause'SA Luxury Expeditions v. Schleien' is significant because it makes clear that conduct that may have the intent or effect of disparagement—but is not itself disparaging—may not breach a settlement agreement's non-disparagement clause unless such conduct is expressly prohibited by that clause.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
9 minute read
Trending Stories