April 24, 2019 | New York Law Journal
District Court Reduces Class Counsel's Attorney Fee Award in Light of Reversionary ClauseSettlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses 'Grice v. Pepsi Beverages Co.' in which, after reaching a class action settlement, class counsel sought approval of their attorney fees. The court reduced the attorney fee award by more than one-third based primarily on the reversionary clause in the settlement agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
9 minute read
January 25, 2019 | New York Law Journal
District Court Refuses to Vacate Sanctions Awards Following SettlementIn his Settlements and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses a recent decision from the Southern District of New York, which reminds us that the parties are not the only ones who have a say in what can be resolved in a settlement agreement. Courts have an interest in preserving their authority to enforce orders and procedural rules, and parties cannot avoid the consequences of noncompliance through private settlement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
7 minute read
October 26, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Attorney Sanctioned for 'Objector Extortion' in Class Action SettlementSettlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses a decision which shows that, while courts recognize the important role that class action objectors can play in safeguarding class interests, when an objector or his counsel acts in bad faith to extort a personal payment, sanctions may be imposed.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
10 minute read
July 27, 2018 | New York Law Journal
District Court Denies Enforcement of 'Settlement' Deemed Preliminary and Non-bindingIn his Settlement and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey compares the federal and state approaches to the law of preliminary agreements.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
1 minute read
January 26, 2018 | New York Law Journal
District Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Enforce a Settlement Following Dismissal and AppealSettlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses a recent decision which reminds us of the pitfalls that come with negotiating a settlement in the wake of successful motion to dismiss. If those negotiations turn sour, and one party seeks to enforce a settlement agreement, the parties may be left without a clear judicial home to resolve the dispute.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
7 minute read
July 28, 2017 | New York Law Journal
'Standard' Provisions Not Implied Into Settlement AgreementSettlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey writes: A recent Southern District of New York case offers the lesson that a writing other than a formal settlement agreement may constitute an enforceable agreement—even if one of the parties expects that additional "standard" provisions will be added to the agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
14 minute read
April 26, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Oral Settlements in Open Court Enforceable Without Follow-On WritingIn his Settlement and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey writes: An agreement to settle a case is generally not binding until it is put into writing and either signed or entered as a court order. But as a recent case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York illustrates, there is an important exception: Agreements made between counsel in open court are enforceable, even if one party changes her mind before an anticipated written agreement is complete.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
19 minute read
January 27, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Challenging Settlement Agreements Via 'Retention of Jurisdiction' ProvisionsSettlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey writes that a recent holding in the 'Patton Boggs v. Chevron' case demonstrates that "retention of jurisdiction" provisions in stipulations of dismissal can lead to litigation with non-parties over underlying settlement agreements. At the same time, it signals to would-be intervenors in such cases that they must show not only that they have legally protected interests in the settlement agreements, but also that there are proceedings in the dismissed actions in which they seek to intervene.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
24 minute read
October 28, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Are Benefit Plans Members of a Settlement Class?Settlement and Compromise columnist Thomas E.L. Dewey examines the Second Circuit's decision in 'Rothstein v. American International Group', on the definition of a settlement class in a securities class action settlement. As is common in such settlements, the settlement agreements contained a provision excluding the defendant's "affiliates" from recovering settlement proceeds. Although class-action settlement agreements frequently exclude defendants' affiliates from the settlement class, this case presented an unusual question: Are employee benefit plans sponsored by the settling defendant its affiliates such that they are excluded from the settlement class?
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
15 minute read
July 28, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Considering Parties' Conduct in Enforcing Settlement AgreementsIn his Settlement and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey writes: The Second Department recently issued an interesting decision holding that a writing from a party's former attorney that is followed by performance of the settlement agreement satisfies CPLR $#167;2104's standard for enforceability of a settlement agreement.
By Thomas E.L. Dewey
8 minute read
Trending Stories