The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Allison L. Krupp and Christopher W. Woodward | August 20, 2024
After the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined in 2021 that "regular use exclusions" in UM/UIM policies violate the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), and in a post-Gallagher legal landscape, some were ready to put the regular use exclusion to rest for good. Now, however, in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 308 A.3d 780 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a lengthy majority opinion, has confirmed that the regular use exclusion remains very much alive.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Patricia B. Santelle, Lynndon K. Groff and Morgan Liptak | August 20, 2024
During the past few years, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have rapidly transformed from an "emerging" risk into an "emerged" risk. PFAS coverage litigation, which has increased correspondingly, may forecast future coverage fights concerning other risks as they potentially move from "emerging" to "emerged" status as well.
By Sulaiman Abdur-Rahman | August 19, 2024
"The factual allegations are baseless, the legal claims are frivolous, and the damages figure is pure fantasy," a Verizon spokesperson said of the antitrust class action. "We are confident a court will see this complaint for what it is while Verizon customers continue to enjoy Wi-Fi calling and mobile data as features of their service plans."
By Brian Lee | August 19, 2024
Court workers say a provision that requires disputes to be decided by the deputy chief administrative judge was not agreed to by their union.
By Cheryl Miller | August 19, 2024
A three-judge panel agreed that some reporting language in the Age-Appropriate Design Code Act is unconstitutional. But the district court should not have blocked other provisions, the judges said.
Daily Business Review | Commentary
By Michael Elkins | August 19, 2024
The Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board are facing imminent danger because of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision eliminating Chevron deference.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Neil C. Schur | August 19, 2024
On Aug. 6, following a nine-week bench trial, a federal court found in United States v. Google and Colorado v. Google that Google has monopolized the market for "general search services" on the internet.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Michael V. Caruso and Lauren M. Lynam | August 19, 2024
This law has been coined the "nation's strongest environmental justice law." It also marks a significant step in ensuring that environmental burdens are more equitably distributed and that historically marginalized areas are not further compromised by industrial activities and development.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Adrienne B. Koch | August 19, 2024
Not every order that can be appealed on an interlocutory basis "necessarily affects the final judgment." In practice, it can be difficult to tell what does and what does not—and the Court of Appeals has admitted that its jurisprudence on this issue "may not all be consistent."
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Owen R. Wolfe and Eddy Salcedo | August 19, 2024
CPLR Section 5704 ("Review of ex parte orders") provides an avenue for Appellate Division review of such a refusal to sign an order to show cause. Unfortunately, however, New York courts have yet to provide clear guidance on when such applications will or will not be granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...