Build a Customized Pennsylvania 6-Credit CLE Compliance Bundle

Individually select approved CLE courses from our centralized online library no matter where you practice.

The Pennsylvania 6 Credit Bundle incudes six (6) CLE credit hours and allows you to select the courses you want from the PA course catalog including the two (2) hours required in Ethics.

The Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board allows attorneys to take six (6) CLE hours online.

We will report all CLE credits earned on CLECenter.com to the PA CLE Board. Please update your MCLE Profile to include your PA bar number.

You have one year from the date of purchase to complete your programs.

Please click here for answers to frequently asked questions.

$169.00

Add to Cart

Buy the bundle and earn credits for following courses!

Courses

766 Courses

Sort by

56 minutes

Riding the Wave: Visiting and Revisiting the Automatic Stay, Discharge Injunction, and Sanctions in the Wake of Fulton v. City of Chicago and Taggart v. Lorenzen

This panel will discuss the current state of the law and open issues regarding the automatic stay, discharge injunction and sanctions in light of the Supreme Court’s rulings in Fulton v. City of Chicago and Taggart v. Lorenzen.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Substantive

11 Credit States

More Details

58 minutes

Understanding and Enhancing the Business Value of Post-COVID-19 Distressed Businesses

Many businesses thrived and grew during the COVID-19 pandemic, while others died on the vine. How do you understand the value of distressed businesses in a post-COVID-19 world? This panel will explore how to evaluate post-COVID-19 business plans and tax strategies to enhance and preserve value.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Substantive

11 Credit States

More Details

62 minutes

Mass Tort Chapter 11 Cases Today: Sexual Abuse, Opioid and Asbestos Cases

Opioid, sexual abuse and asbestos cases have been all over the news in the last few years. This panel of experts will discuss and analyze the complex issues involved in mass tort chapter 11 cases today, including current issues involving future claims, nonconsensual releases and plan-confirmation issues.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Substantive

11 Credit States

More Details

60 minutes

Financial Planning for Senior Clients

The seminar will give you a better understanding of the elder care perspective—the 360-degree view you need to make optimum plans for senior citizens and their families in an aging society.

The National Underwriter

1 - Substantive

12 Credit States

More Details

61 minutes

Ethics: Hold or Fold Them?

Ever get stuck with one of “those” clients? (We’ve all been there.) What do you do when you uncover serious problems with a debtor? Learn the right —and wrong —ways to extract yourself from a problem case. This panel will discuss limited-scope representation and the ability of the attorney to withdraw before, during and after the bankruptcy case.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Ethics

11 Credit States

More Details

62 minutes

Post-Filing Issue-Spotting

Sometimes a bankruptcy case isn’t over when it’s over, especially when certain issues arise (like the debtor suddenly “discovering” a bank account he or she forgot to “mention”). Learn how to navigate some of the most common post-filing problems that can crop up.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Substantive

11 Credit States

More Details

59 minutes

Defending a 523/727 Action

Bankruptcy discharges go to “honest but unfortunate debtors,” but creditors (because they want their money!) don’t always give up their quests to extract money, even after a bankruptcy case concludes. These useful case examples will guide practitioners through a survey of the most common quarrels over discharges and exceptions.

American Bankruptcy Institute

1 - Substantive

11 Credit States

More Details

68 minutes

Taking Rule 3002.1 Sanctions Down the Gravel Road to Casa Blanco

In this session, the panelists will cover both Gravel (and the dissent) and a recent bankruptcy court opinion (In re Blanco) that rejects the reasoning in Gravel. Can the two cases be reconciled? What is the standard that must be established to justify the imposition of sanctions when mortgage-servicers fail to comply with Rule 3002.1’s requirements, and what are the limitations on the amount of sanctions that can be considered appropriate?