By Charles Toutant | August 2, 2022
"Plaintiff believes that all Buddhists should be able to use self-determination to make choices to access abortion services and birth control with no restriction on movement, autonomy, type, or timing," Miami-Dade County Buddhist leader Lama Karma Chotso said in a suit.
By Mason Lawlor | August 2, 2022
"No employee should live in fear of what will happen to them if they report misconduct, least of all misconduct that affects millions of Americans."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | August 2, 2022
A lawyer representing GOP state House members said there are more challenges to Act 77 to come.
By Andrew Goudsward | August 2, 2022
The Justice Department's lawsuit alleges that the Idaho law conflicts with a federal statute requiring hospitals to provide adequate emergency care.
By Mason Lawlor | August 2, 2022
'"A defendant must have notice and an opportunity to be heard on the issue of probation revocation,' and 'any hearing must comport with principles of fundamental fairness."'
New York Law Journal | Expert Opinion
By Gary M. Rosenberg and Alexander Lycoyannis | August 2, 2022
In their Landlord-Tenant Law column, Gary Rosenberg and Alexander Lycoyannis summarize several pending constitutional challenges in the federal courts that, if successful, could profoundly alter New York's real estate landscape.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | August 2, 2022
It is not hyperbole to note that not only does a bill like S1373 seek to control a woman's body, but also her mind.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | August 2, 2022
Our society – especially attorneys – should recognize the institutional importance of representing unpopular clients and refrain from criticizing those that follow John Adams' path.
Daily Report Online | Conversation
By Christine Schiffner | August 1, 2022
Chuck Cooper and Ashley Keller will both represent the plaintiff in a case against Atlanta-based Norfolk Southern Railway during the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term.
By Mason Lawlor | August 1, 2022
"We conclude that this ruling requires we now hold Maryland's 'good and substantial reason' requirement unconstitutional. And were the similarities between this requirement and New York's now stricken proper cause requirement not self-evident enough, the Bruen Court expressly noted that Maryland was one of six states to 'have analogues to the 'proper cause' standards,' citing Md. Pub. Safety § 5-306(a)(6)(ii) and quoting its 'good and substantial reason' language," Chief Justice Gregory Wells wrote on behalf of the appellate panel.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...