By Katheryn Hayes Tucker | August 1, 2022
"Plaintiffs bring this action under the Georgia Constitution's rights to privacy, liberty, and equal protection, seeking declaratory and interlocutory injunctive relief," the complaint said.
By Avalon Zoppo | August 1, 2022
As part of its review, the panel grappled with which intermediate scrutiny test to apply.
National Law Journal | Conversation
By Christine Schiffner | August 1, 2022
Chuck Cooper and Ashley Keller will both represent the plaintiff in a case against Norfolk Southern Railway during the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Marc Spindelman | August 1, 2022
Dobbs painfully teaches that the Supreme Court is no longer a stalwart guarantor of a constitutional order that itself ensures women's freedom and equality in public and intimate life against the vicissitudes of politics.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | July 28, 2022
According to Alan Epstein of Spector Gadon Rosen Vinci, Monge's lawyer, the widespread national coverage criticizing Monge's work began with one local story based on an untrue premise.
By Marcia Coyle | July 28, 2022
The government won 58% of cases where it was a party, but suffered key losses on abortion and gun control.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Colleen Murphy | July 28, 2022
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, adding to a federal circuit split on the issue, has ruled that opt-in plaintiffs to Fair Labor and Standards Act collective actions must establish that their claims arise from the defendant's minimum contacts with the forum state, not the entire country.
By Allison Dunn | July 28, 2022
"Given our review of the relevant federal case law and the particular facts of the case—specifically that (1) the plaintiff was not seat belted, (2) the defendant refused to acquire a larger vehicle, and (3) the defendant drove erratically and exceeded the speed limit—we conclude that the allegations in the plaintiff's complaint and the record before the court in connection with the defendant's motion for summary judgment do not give rise to a claim of deliberate indifference because no federal precedent clearly establishes that the defendant's conduct violates the constitution," Chief Justice William H. Bright Jr. wrote on behalf of the appellate panel.
By Charles Toutant | July 27, 2022
The Third Circuit remand of the Chatham case embodies the notion that "we're not going to bend over backwards to make sure there's a separation of church and state. Instead, we're going to bend over backwards to make sure everybody can pray, even if the result is one that seems to cross that line between separation of church and state," said attorney Lawrence Lustberg.
By Jane Wester | July 27, 2022
The panel majority said a "self-described civil libertarian" may challenge the statute but stopped short of a blanket declaration it was unconstitutional.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...