New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Adam M. Slater | November 9, 2018
Taken together, the decisions represent an established philosophy that will shape the outcomes of significant litigation in New Jersey for years to come.
By Amanda Bronstad | November 8, 2018
Among other things, objectors allege that plaintiffs lawyers were not entitled to $21.3 million in legal fees.
By Amanda Bronstad | November 8, 2018
Among other things, objectors allege that plaintiffs lawyers were not entitled to $21.3 million in legal fees.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Catelyn McDonough | November 8, 2018
Whether it's a headache, occasional heartburn or runny nose, we all know the routine: stop by the local drugstore on the way home and pick up some over-the-counter (OTC) medicine.
By Dan Clark | November 7, 2018
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, has announced draft legislation for a data protection bill that would impose severe criminal penalties for violations including heavy fines for companies, and possible 10- to 20-year prison sentences for senior executives at the world's largest data collectors.
By Sarah L. Brew, Tyler A. Young, Emily R. Bodtke and Rita Mansuryan | November 7, 2018
In what seems like an uncharacteristic move for the historically consumer-friendly state, California recently added new safe harbors protecting product manufacturers from claims of “slack fill” in packaging, signaling a dwindling receptivity to the recent spurt of slack fill litigation in that state.
By Charles Toutant | November 6, 2018
The "zombie debts" were once legitimate but have since been paid off, settled, discharged in bankruptcy or rendered uncollectible by state statutes of limitations.
By Jenna Greene | November 6, 2018
The litigation concerns roof shingles—a decidedly un-sexy product. But the underlying issue is a hot one: what constitutes a valid arbitration agreement?
By Ross Todd | November 5, 2018
A federal judge in San Jose mostly turned back a request from Plano, Texas-based Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. to toss the California class action finding consumers could plausibly claim they expected Canada Dry to contain ginger root rather than a ginger derivative.
By Ross Todd | November 5, 2018
A federal judge in San Jose mostly turned back a request from Plano, Texas-based Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. to toss the California class action finding consumers could plausibly claim they expected Canada Dry to contain ginger root rather than a ginger derivative.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...