By Michael Booth | October 2, 2018
A three-judge Appellate Division panel in April overturned two lower court rulings that said the customers could be compelled to arbitrate their disputes.
By Jim Saunders | October 2, 2018
Pointing to conflicting opinions in the state's appellate courts, attorneys last week filed notices asking the Supreme Court to take up a St. Lucie County case about a water-damage insurance claim.
By Ross Todd | October 1, 2018
"The court finds that some of plaintiffs' allegations are at full capacity, but others need to be recharged," wrote Judge Edward Davila.
By Ross Todd | October 1, 2018
"The court finds that some of plaintiffs' allegations are at full capacity, but others need to be recharged," wrote Judge Edward Davila.
By Christine Sexton | October 1, 2018
Members of a statewide advisory panel were told last week that the Agency for Health Care Administration is “in the process of working with” insurance giant Florida Blue on getting claims data to use for the long-promised website that is supposed to help consumers compare health-care prices.
By Ross Todd | September 28, 2018
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Christopher Chorba said at a hearing on Friday that customers had authorized Apple to install software on the affected iPhones which saw decreased performance speeds as results of efforts to squelch sudden, unexpected shutdowns.
By Michael Booth | September 28, 2018
Lawyers squared off before the New Jersey Supreme Court on Thursday, debating—for the benefit of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit—whether the National Football League's Super Bowl ticket sales practices violate the state's consumer fraud law.
By Ross Todd | September 27, 2018
Apple's lawyers will ask a federal judge on Friday to toss claims involving software changes that caused certain iPhone models to slow performance, and to "reject plaintiffs' counsel's attempt to make this the first worldwide consumer MDL in history."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | September 26, 2018
An argument a teenager might make after being caught drinking at a party was essentially employed by the lawyer for an energy company, who asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to upend a $1.8 million penalty imposed on it for price gouging because "everybody did it."
By Dan M. Clark | Cheryl Miller | September 26, 2018
The settlement, which includes $26 million for California, is the result of a multistate investigation that found Uber paid hackers $100,000 to conceal the breach, which exposed the names, email addresses, and cellphone numbers of 57 million users.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...