By Bruce Love | September 23, 2021
"People can be brilliant attorneys, but when it comes to their own issues, smart lawyers recognize that they need counsel with the specific expertise necessary to help them present their case," said Clifford Robert.
The Legal Intelligencer | Analysis
By Justin Henry | September 22, 2021
The justices endorsed a standard developed by Connecticut courts for weighing the use of comfort dogs for witnesses.
By Ellen Bardash | September 17, 2021
Cannabis law reform advocates said the decision was likely the first from any state's supreme court to weigh in on whether the smell of marijuana alone can justify a warrantless arrest for possession.
By Cedra Mayfield | September 16, 2021
"I will always prefer in-person, because I enjoy getting to see the attorneys, but I have found that I am able to glean the necessary information about a case as easily via Zoom," said Court of Appeals of Georgia Presiding Judge Sara L. Doyle.
By Cheryl Miller | September 15, 2021
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a lawyer's request to force the Third District Court of Appeal to speed up its processing of criminal cases.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Allison Dunn | September 15, 2021
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear arguments over whether a doctor's testimony about blood alcohol level and its effect on memory and perception constitutes impermissible expert testimony about a witness' credibility.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | September 14, 2021
Because former officer Mark Icker pleaded guilty to charges of depriving the women of their civil right to bodily integrity—and not a sexual offense—he need not register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held.
By Ellen Bardash | September 10, 2021
In a reversal of a Superior Court decision, the panel ruled that the mandatory minimum sentence for a person with two prior felony convictions can't be enforced once one of those offenses is no longer considered a violent crime.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Louis Locascio | September 10, 2021
COURT WATCH: Columnist and retired judge analyzes a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of New Jersey that he considers incorrect and goes beyond what was envisioned by 'Miranda v. Arizona.'
By Katheryn Tucker | September 9, 2021
"I worry that it sets a dangerous standard for police use of force," said Judge Jill Pryor in her dissenting opinion. "The record belies the dissent's rose-colored narrative," Judge William Pryor said in the majority opinion.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...