The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | July 1, 2021
A man convicted of obscenity for sending sexually explicit text messages to an unknown recipient has successfully argued that his behavior did not meet the legal definition of "obscene material."
By Tony Mauro | June 30, 2021
"There are very few issues I would want to argue in the Supreme Court, but this is an issue that I've literally been living with for three years," said Shon Hopwood, who may get to argue before the nation's high court.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | June 30, 2021
While Wednesday's meeting sounded largely academic, there were hints at how the group might act. Commissioners asked witnesses whether the court was at the stage where reforms are even necessary, and how they might decide that they are.
By Cedra Mayfield | June 30, 2021
The appellate panel sided with the district court, affirming the decision to compel the campaign lawyer to testify before the grand jury.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | Lizzy McLellan | June 30, 2021
Because an ex-district attorney publicly agreed not to prosecute the case, the high court wiped out Cosby's sexual assault conviction and barred any future charges.
By Max Mitchell | June 30, 2021
Because an ex-district attorney publicly agreed not to prosecute the case, the high court wiped out Cosby's sexual assault conviction and barred any future charges.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael C. Miller and Michael G. Scavelli | June 30, 2021
Ten considerations that are key to a winning trial strategy for a party taking the Fifth.
By Tom McParland | June 28, 2021
The move, announced by Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston, retains one innovation of pandemic-era appellate advocacy that has proved popular to litigators.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | June 27, 2021
We think the most sensible interpretation of the "DNA evidence" exception is that the limitation period begins once the state has possession of the forensic sample itself.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | June 24, 2021
In a precedential decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that because a warrant for a man suspected of child molestation—which included an assumption that he likely possessed child pornography—was executed in good faith, the nearly 70,000 illegal images obtained by a police search should be admissible as evidence.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...