Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
571 results for '* topic:"Contracts"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-08-05
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Holt and Curtis J. Crowther, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE; Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm, P.C., Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69061
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss, because the record did not contain sufficient information to conduct a choice of law analysis.
Publication Date: 2020-07-29
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard P.A., Wilmington, DE; Kent E. Baldauf, Jr. and Barry J. Coyne , The Webb Law Firm, Pittsburgh, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Michael F. Duggan and Marc Sposato, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Stephen H. Luther and Ryan T. Santurri, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt& Gilchrist, PA, Orlando, FL for defendants.
Case Number: D69064
Breach of contract claims were untimely where the claims accrued after plaintiff was put on notice defendant may have developed and patented a product based off plaintiff's product in breach of the parties' agreement.
Publication Date: 2020-07-22
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Holt and Curtis J. Crowther, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE; Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm, P.C., Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69061
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss, because the record did not contain sufficient information to conduct a choice of law analysis.
Publication Date: 2020-07-15
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Sullivan, Sullivan Hazeltine Allinson LLC, Wilmington, DE; Philip S. Rosenzweig, Silverang, Rosenzweig & Haltzman, LLC, King of Prussia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: R. Karl Hill, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69050
The record provided evidence which could support the existence of an enforceable oral contract, so the court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2020-06-17
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory P. Williams, Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew D. Perri, and Kevin M. Regan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Santoro and Roger W. Feicht, Gunster, West Palm Beach, FL, for plaintiff.
for defendant: Martin S. Lessner, Lauren Dunkle Fortunato, and Kevin P. Rickert, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for defendants.
Case Number: D69014
Breach of asset purchase agreement claims allowed to proceed where plaintiff alleged defendant sellers breached agreement by making unauthorized post-closing payments to certain defendants and by failing to disclose pre-closing liabilities.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Ron M. Campbell
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-06-03
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jody C. Barillare and Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael D. Blanchard, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Hartford, CT; Julie S. Goldemberg, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jonathan M. Stemerman, Elliott Greenleaf, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Thomas J. Elliott, Frederick P. Santarelli, Jack P. Elliott, and Colin J. O’Boyle, Elliott Greenleaf, P.C., Blue Bell, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D69000
Injunctive relief granted to preserve the status quo ante and prevent defendant from resorting to measures to force plaintiff to capitulate before a court could resolve the parties' dispute.
Publication Date: 2020-04-22
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: : Jody C. Barillare, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Rollin B. Chippey II and Benjamin P. Smith, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Elizabeth A. Mullin, and Aubrey J. Morin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Ruskusky and Lisa C. Sullivan, Nixon Peabody, LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiff-Intervenor. Gregory P. Williams, Steven J. Fineman, Nicole K. Pedi, and Angela Lam, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Martin S. Schenker and Benjamin H. Kleine, of Cooley, LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michelle S. Rhyu, Cooley, LLP, Palo Alto, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68952
Defendant fraudulently induced plaintiff's investment into spin-out company by representing broad definition of transferred technology while knowingly limiting transfer to the spin-off and continuing to work on technology outside the narrow definition.
Publication Date: 2020-01-22
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jon E. Abramczyk, D. McKinley Measley, Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; James F. Bennett, John D. Comerford, Dowd Bennett LLP, St. Louis, MO for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard P. Rollo, Travis S. Hunter, Alexandra M. Ewing, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Eric B. Halper, Virginia I. Weber, McKool Smith P.C., New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D68846
Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's contract claim where plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law in the form of monetary damages to compensate plaintiff for defendants' past breaches and in the form of a declaratory judgment establishing defendants' contractual purchase obligations.
Publication Date: 2020-01-15
Practice Area: Contracts | Damages
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bradley R. Aronstam, S. Michael Sirkin, and R. Garrett Rice, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph S. Allerhand, Seth Goodchild, and Tania C. Matsuoka, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY; Mark W. Friedman, William H. Taft V, Carl Micarelli, and Lisa Wang Lachowicz, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Joseph B. Cicero and Gregory E. Stuhlman, Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph J. LoBue and Helene Gogadze, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68838
Second arbitration enjoined to the extent it constituted collateral attack on damages award from prior arbitration between the parties, but plaintiff's claim pled but not decided in first arbitration could proceed to a determination on arbitrability.
Publication Date: 2019-10-16
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Software | Transportation
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Hardiman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68736
Evidence sufficient to support jury verdict of contractual breach where verdict implicitly required finding that losing party was required to fulfill obligation and that its failure to do so prevented prevailing party from fulfilling its express contractual obligation.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read