Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
571 results for '* topic:"Contracts"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-10-16
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Fallon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68734
Motion to extend scheduling order deadline denied where moving party failed to demonstrate good cause because it was or should have been cognizant of likely delays in discovery when agreeing to scheduling order deadlines.
Publication Date: 2019-08-07
Practice Area: Contracts | Fee Disputes
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Myron T. Steele, Arthur L. Dent, and Andrew H. Sauder, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven M. Coren, and David M. DeVito, Kaufman, Coren & Ress, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for appellants
for defendant: David J. Margules, Elizabeth A. Sloan, and Jessica C. Watt, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Burt M. Rublin, Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA for appellees
Case Number: D68656
Sales agreement was not subject to restricted activities provision of party's LLC agreement where only required payments fell under the scope of the provision and commission payments in sales agreement were not required since party retained unilateral ability to decide whether to make the payment.
Publication Date: 2019-04-17
Practice Area: Contracts | Damages
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul D. Sunshine, Reger, Rizzo, & Darnall, LLP; Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty, & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for defendants
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D68528
Indemnification for party's own negligence was triggered under the co-defendants' agreement by plaintiff's complaint asserting similar allegations of negligence against both sets of defendants.
Publication Date: 2019-03-27
Practice Area: Contracts | Litigation
Industry: Consulting | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Theodore A. Kittila and James G. McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Christopher P. Simon and David G. Holmes, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68504
Plaintiff owed duty to preserve emails of former employees from the point defendant threatened legal action, but defendant failed to show plaintiff acted in bad faith or to deny evidence to defendant in support of an order of sanctions.
Publication Date: 2019-03-20
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Consulting | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher P. Simon and David G. Holmes, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff.
for defendant: Theodore A. Kittila and James G, McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE, for defendant.
Case Number: D68494
Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's breach of contract claim denied where the contract terms were ambiguous as to the trigger for payment and where the parties appeared to have differing expectations.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-02-27
Practice Area: Contracts | Dispute Resolution
Industry: Consumer Products | Distribution and Wholesale
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert McHale, McHale Law, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: David A. Dorey and Craig N. Haring, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason A. Synderman, John Wixted, and Huaou Yan, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68471
Plaintiffs' complaint dismissed in favor of an agreement to arbitrate between the parties, where all of plaintiffs' claims arose from the parties' contract containing an enforceable arbitration clause, which was valid despite naming a non-existent arbitration forum and where defendants had not waived their right to arbitrate before another court.
Publication Date: 2019-02-06
Practice Area: Business Torts | Contracts
Industry: Aerospace | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68448
Breach by premature termination claims not dismissed where there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether plaintiff had entered agreements that precluded it from entering its agreements with defendant and had fraudulently induced defendant to enter the agreements.
Publication Date: 2019-02-06
Practice Area: Contracts | Employment Litigation
Industry: Consulting | Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Cooch
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Theodore A. Kittila and James G. McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas & Kittila, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plain-tiff.
for defendant: Sharon Oras Morgan and Courtney A. Emerson Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68452
Plaintiff established the right to recover severance pay under the parties' employment agreement and based on promissory estoppel.
Publication Date: 2019-01-23
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Clark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Paul G. Enterline, Georgetown, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D68432
Trial court erroneously denied motion to amend pleadings to add quasi-contractual claims where defendant's acquiescence to introduction of evidence in support of those claims and argument on those claims in defendant's own pleadings demonstrated implied consent to trying the claims and a lack of surprise by amendment.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Myron T. Steele, Arthur L. Dent, and Andrew H. Sauder of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven M. Coren and David M. DeVito of Kaufman, Coren & Ress, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for appellants
for defendant: David J. Margules, Elizabeth A. Sloan, and Jessica C. Watt of Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Burt M. Rublin of Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for appellees.
Case Number: D68358
Judgment reversed and remanded where parties concurred that if provision of alleged breaching party's operating agreement applied to the parties' sales agreement, it would render that agreement void and incapable of ratification by the parties' conduct.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read