Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
191 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-10-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel E. Ross, Bradley R. Aronstam, Ross Aronstam & Moritz, Wilmington, DE; Joshua S. Amsel, Matthew R. Friedenberg, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Joseph H. Huston, Jr., Stevens & Lee P.C., Wilmington, DE; Robert K. Keach, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, ME for receiver. Ryan P. Newell, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for nominal defendants.
Case Number: D69561
Claimant was entitled to indemnification of his litigation expenses, and the court granted his motion to intervene because he had a valid property interest which was not adequately protected by existing parties.
Publication Date: 2021-10-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Moyer, Travis S. Hunter, Katharine L. Mowery, Tyler E. Cragg, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for Humanigen, Inc., Nomis Bay Ltd. and Madison Joint Venture LLC. Steven P. Wood, Travis J. Ferguson, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE
for defendant: Reid Skibell, Harris, St. Laurent & Wechsler LLP, New York, NY; Mazin A. Sbaiti, J. Michal Zapendowski, Sbaiti & Co. LLC, Dallas, TX for Savant Neglected Diseases, LLC.
Case Number: D69562
Where the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment and both sides requested reargument, the court granted re-consideration to clarify its rulings.
Publication Date: 2021-09-22
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Insurance | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Clayton Athey, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Hugh J. Marbury, Ryan P. Bottegal, Cozen O’Connor, Washington, DC; Stuart M.G. Seraina, Baldwin Seraina, Baltimore, MD for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Brian Lemon, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott S. Christie, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69545
Significant factual disputes precluded summary judgment in this case involving end user licensing agreements for plaintiffs' software products.
Publication Date: 2021-09-15
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Wilks, Scott B. Czerwonka, Wilks Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jordan E. Stern, William H. Newman, Becker, Glynn, Muffly, Chassin & Hosinski, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Catherine A. Gaul, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Beth A. Bryan, Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, Cincinnati, OH for defendants.
Case Number: D69539
The court rejected plaintiff's motion for a stay and granted defendant's motion to dismiss because plaintiff's lawsuit was based on contingent events and was not yet ripe for litigation.
Publication Date: 2021-09-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Margaret M. DiBianca, Clark Hill PLC, Wilmington, DE; Kevin B. Watson, Stephen M. Wolf, Clark Hill PLC, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Richard D. Abrams, Timothy H. Rohs, Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69530
Property inspection company was entitled to summary judgment because plaintiffs' claims were barred by the statute of limitations and no tolling applied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-09-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Scott M. Tucker, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joshua D. Arisohn, Bursor & Fisher, P.A., New York, NY; Christopher P. Simon, Michael L. Vild, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Eric M. Poulin, Roy T. Willey, IV, Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, Charleston, SC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: James D. Taylor, Jr., Charles E. Davis, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69532
Students and parents stated viable claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment after a university switched to online classes due to the pandemic and refused to refund certain fees and tuition charges.
Publication Date: 2021-09-01
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lee H. Rubin, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Matthew E. Fischer, Aaron R. Sims of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Shahzeb Lari, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D69525
Factual issues precluded dismissal based on the equitable defense of laches at the pleading stage, but the court granted de-fendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for conversion.
Publication Date: 2021-09-01
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Shannon, Christopher N. Kelly and Daniel M. Rusk, IV, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; William C. O’Neil, Joanna R. Travalini, Adam J. Smith, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss, J. Peter Shindel, Adam K. Schulman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Layne E. Kruse, Joy Soloway, Kelly Potter, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Houston, TX for defendants.
Case Number: D69522
Seller's subsidiary was bound to a forum selection clause based on estoppel, even though it was not a signatory to the sale agreement.
Publication Date: 2021-08-25
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: E-Commerce | Software
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Chagares
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69515
The court affirmed a judgment enforcing an arbitrator's award, because the arbitrator acted within the scope of his authority and the award contained no manifest error.
Publication Date: 2021-08-25
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Zimmitti, Joshua Drian, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Rudolf Koch, Travis S. Hunter, Matthew D. Perri, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey B. Korn, Vanessa C. Richardson, Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, NY; Alexander L. Cheney, Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case Number: D69516
Where sellers allegedly engaged in fraud in the inducement of a contract, they could not rely on limitation provisions contained in that contract to avoid plaintiffs' fraud claims.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read