• Moscowitz v. Theory Ent. LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-11-25
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Stanton L. Stein, Ashley R. Yeargan, Russ, August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, Michael A. Barlow, Joseph A. Sparco, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott A. Edelman, Ilissa Samplin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D69202

    Plaintiff was bound by the terms of an agreement regarding the company's right to repurchase his owner-ship units following his resignation, but questions remained regarding the validity and effect of plaintiff's no-tices of resignation.

  • Langston v. Exterior Pro Solutions, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-11-04
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Construction
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Jurden
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Hanson, Jr., Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Victoria K. Petrone, Brian V. DeMott, Baird Mandalas Brockstedt LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69178

    A complaint and its accompanying documents together enabled the calculation of a sum certain for damag-es, so plaintiff was entitled to a default judgment in that amount.

  • Sprint Commc'ns Co. L.P. v. Mediacom Commc'ns Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-10-07
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
    for defendant: Andrew C. Mayo, Steven J. Balick, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Robinson Vu, Natalie Alfaro Gonzales, Lindsay Volpenheim Cutié, Amy Bergeron, Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston, TX; Timothy S. Durst, Baker Botts L.L.P., Dallas, TX for defendant. Richard L. Renck, Oderah C. Nwaeze, Duane Morris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew C. Gaudet, Duane Morris LLP, Atlanta, GA; John M. Baird, Duane Morris LLP, Washington, DC for Metaswitch third-party defendants.

    Case Number: D69149

    The exercise of specific personal jurisdiction over a foreign third-party defendant comported with due process, so the court denied a motion to dismiss claims against that party.

  • MTA Canada Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-30
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Mining and Resources
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter L. Frattareli, Kevin F. Shaw, Archer & Greiner, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Robert A. Penza, Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; R. Montgomery Donaldson, Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69137

    The unambiguous language of a contract included an anti-assignment provision.

  • Parexel Int'l (IRL) Ltd. v. Xynomic Pharm., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-16
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss and April M. Kirby, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kurt S. Kusiak, Fitch Law Partners LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Lisa Zwally Brown and Samuel L. Moultrie, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69123

    Although defendant did not object to invoices, plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment because defendant raised issues of material fact regarding plaintiff's failure to perform multiple aspects of the parties' agreement.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • vMedex, Inc. v. TDS Operating, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-09
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ann M. Kashishian, Kashisian Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Marlo J. Hittman, Law Office of Marlo J. Hittman, Livingston, NJ for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Marc S. Casarino, White & Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE; David M. Friebus, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.

    Case Number: D69116

    Plaintiffs adequately alleged one of their claims for breach of contract, but the court granted motions to dismiss the remainder of their claims.

  • XAPT Corp. v. Deere & Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-02
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Manufacturing | Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Flynn, Aubrey J. Morin, Andrew M. Moshos, R. Judson Scaggs, Jr. and Zi-Xiang Shen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kara E.F. Cenar, S. Patrick McKey, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C., Chicago, IL; Ronnie L. White, II and Mary Ann L. Wymore, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C., St. Louis, MO; Lauren Jaffe and Mariangela Seale, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP, Chicago, IL; James L. Higgins, Steven W. Lee and Melanie K. Sharp, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69109

    Plaintiff's breach of contract action was not the functional equivalent of a copyright infringement claim, so the court granted a motion remanding this matter back to state court.

  • Schneider Nat'l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz

    Publication Date: 2020-07-29
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Pittenger and Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Locke Beatty, Brian Riopelle and Heryka R. Knoespel, McGuire Woods LLP, Raleigh, NC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John M. Seaman and Matthew L. Miller, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Anthony S. Fiotto and Kate E. MacLeman Goodwin Proctor LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.

    Case Number: D69068

    Factual issues regarding the parties' obligations under an asset purchase agreement and conflicting testimony about the parties' negotiations precluded summary judgment.

  • HUMC Holdco, LLC v. MPT of Hoboken TRS, LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-07-15
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan M. Hannigan, Robert L. Burns, Ryan D. Konstanzer and Megan E. O’Connor, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Michael P. Kelley and Andrew S. Dupre, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Ackal, III and D. Scott Funk, Gray Reed & McGraw LLP, Houston, TX for Hoboken MPT defendants. Patricia L. Enerio and Jamie L. Brown, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher J. Sullivan, Dominic J. Picca and LisaMarie Collins, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, NY for Propco, Alaris and Opco defendants.

    Case Number: D69049

    Factual issues precluded judgment on the pleadings with respect to issues involving a right of first refusal and transfer restrictions under a limited liability company agreement.

  • Sustainability Partners LLC v. Jacobs

    Publication Date: 2020-06-24
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Energy
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathleen M. Miller and Jason Z. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jeffrey Goddess, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert A. Goodin, Goodin, MacBride, Squeri & Day, LLP, San Francisco for defendant.

    Case Number: D69029

    A forum selection clause in a company's operating agreement did not bestow personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, because he was not a party to the agreement, nor did he receive any benefit from it.