New York Law Journal | Analysis
By H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal | December 3, 2018
In their Federal E-Discovery column, Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal discuss a decision which provides support for those who want courts to factor data privacy concerns into their determinations of the permissible scope of discovery.
By Michael Booth | November 30, 2018
A title insurance company involved in litigation with a competitor should have been granted a little more time to obtain an affidavit of merit after it learned well into the litigation that its expert had a conflict of interest, a New Jersey appeals court has ruled.
By Roy Strom | November 28, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on uber-litigious Fox Rothschild client Strike 3 Holdings, calling it a copyright troll that 'treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM.'
By Roy Strom | November 27, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on uber-litigious Fox Rothschild client Strike 3 Holdings, calling it a copyright troll that "treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM."
By Roy Strom | November 27, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on a Fox Rothschild team lead by Los Angeles-based partner Lincoln Bandlow who coordinates a national copyright infringement campaign for one of the most litigious companies in the U.S. over the past 13 months.
By Claudia Salomon and Abhinaya Swaminathan | November 23, 2018
Three key considerations and strategic guidance for practitioners seeking third-party discovery in New York.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | November 23, 2018
At a minimum, the lesson to be learned is to raise the issue early in litigation.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Peter F. Vaira | November 19, 2018
Ten years ago, there was little mention of the service of special masters among members of the bar. In the last several years there has been a substantial increase in the appointments of special masters by federal and state courts, on both the trial and appellate level.
By Jenna Greene | November 19, 2018
Strike 3 "treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM. Its feigned desire for legal process masks what it really seeks: for the court to oversee a high-tech shakedown.”
Daily Report Online | Commentary
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | November 19, 2018
By taking steps to become familiar with the rules, attorneys can reduce the risk of sanctions, a deposition do-over, embarrassment or an unhappy client.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...
Fogarty & Hara, Esqs, a well-established Bergen County law firm representing school districts and private schools, seeks an associate at...