By Roy Strom | November 28, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on uber-litigious Fox Rothschild client Strike 3 Holdings, calling it a copyright troll that 'treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM.'
By Roy Strom | November 27, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on uber-litigious Fox Rothschild client Strike 3 Holdings, calling it a copyright troll that "treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM."
By Roy Strom | November 27, 2018
A federal judge in Washington brought the hammer down on a Fox Rothschild team lead by Los Angeles-based partner Lincoln Bandlow who coordinates a national copyright infringement campaign for one of the most litigious companies in the U.S. over the past 13 months.
By Claudia Salomon and Abhinaya Swaminathan | November 23, 2018
Three key considerations and strategic guidance for practitioners seeking third-party discovery in New York.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | November 23, 2018
At a minimum, the lesson to be learned is to raise the issue early in litigation.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Peter F. Vaira | November 19, 2018
Ten years ago, there was little mention of the service of special masters among members of the bar. In the last several years there has been a substantial increase in the appointments of special masters by federal and state courts, on both the trial and appellate level.
By Jenna Greene | November 19, 2018
Strike 3 "treats this court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM. Its feigned desire for legal process masks what it really seeks: for the court to oversee a high-tech shakedown.”
Daily Report Online | Commentary
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | November 19, 2018
By taking steps to become familiar with the rules, attorneys can reduce the risk of sanctions, a deposition do-over, embarrassment or an unhappy client.
By Helen Stocklin-Enright, Perkins Coie | November 19, 2018
Building pauses into work can equip us to maintain the ever-important perspective that navigating e-discovery well requires.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By David Paul Horowitz and Lukas M. Horowitz | November 13, 2018
In their Burden of Proof column, David Paul Horowitz and Lukas M. Horowitz discuss two changes to the CPLR, the first a new section in article 45 designed to facilitate the admission into evidence of records produced during disclosure by an opposing party, and the second an amendment adding a new subsection (d) to CPLR 2305 designed to permit subpoenaed records to be delivered to an attorney's office and to make certain all parties receive copies of subpoenaed records from the attorney receiving the subpoenaed records.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...