By Marcia Coyle | April 6, 2018
The Justice Department cites its ongoing investigation of Harvard's admissions policies in seeking broad access to key material in a pending lawsuit in Massachusetts.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Ron G. Jones | April 6, 2018
I remember it like it was yesterday. I was at trial, sitting at the defense table and the plaintiff's electronic medical records (EMR) expert was testifying before the jury
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Daniel E. Cummins | April 5, 2018
As they say, "The more things change, the more they remain the same." And so it is with the changing forms of evidence in the digital age including various types of electronic messages and a wide variety of social media platforms designed for the exchange of information, photos and videos.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Thomas Cotton | April 5, 2018
This article discusses two circumstances in which a litigation cyborg can hold an advantage over a human lawyer when arguing discovery's scope.
Daily Report Online | Commentary
By Jeff Kerr | April 3, 2018
Some documents that look bad, embarrassing or just weird will exist in every party's custody.
By Jon Kerry-Tyerman, Everlaw | April 3, 2018
Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim and District Judge Xavier Rodriguez say they regularly see a high percentage of parties appear before them ill-equipped to succeed on e-discovery challenges.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By H. Christopher Boehning & Daniel J. Toal | April 2, 2018
In their Federal E-Discovery column, H. Christopher Boehning & Daniel J. Toal write: 'In re EpiPen' breaks new ground on the standards for designating ESI custodians and, more broadly, on the proper scope of discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1). Judge James provides a clear and coherent set of principles for practitioners.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Nancy B. Levitin and Jeffrey R. Neuman | April 2, 2018
Potential plaintiffs, armed only with a set of facts that evidence wrongdoing and damages, can petition under CPLR 3102(c) for judicial assistance in framing complaints and identifying defendants.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | April 2, 2018
We can see no issue of expert admissibility that could be raised on a motion in limine that could not be raised equally well on a motion for summary judgment. The only difference is one of timing. However, counsel need to be aware.
By Adam Schlagman, Cybersecurity Law & Strategy | April 2, 2018
A roundtable discussion that explores the impact of the internet of things and AI, what the GDPR changes, the unknown future of data and more.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Shift Schedule: Monday-Friday, 9AM-5PMHours Per Week: 35General Responsibilities:Under the supervision of the Director of Legal Services or ...
Shift Schedule: Monday-Friday, 9AM-5PMHours Per Week: 35General Responsibilities:Under the supervision of the Director of Legal Services or ...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking a attorney to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have a mi...