Connecticut Law Tribune | Expert Opinion
By Thomas O'Connor and Wyatt Jansen | February 14, 2018
The perception that summary judgment is more difficult to obtain in Connecticut state courts has led to a series of Superior Court decisions that all but eliminate its utility. Fortunately, the Connecticut Supreme Court has begun to take corrective action.
By Dan Terzian | February 14, 2018
When people switch jobs, both sets of employers face known risks. The former employers risk their former employees decamping with their trade secrets. And the new employers risk inviting trade secret lawsuits.
By Josefa Velasquez | February 13, 2018
The New York State Court of Appeals decided 7-0 that limiting access only to a person's public posts on Facebook is counter to “New York's history of liberal discovery."
By Hal Marcus, OpenText | February 13, 2018
Disclosing your e-discovery process won't foster cooperation from opposing counsel, but your clients will love you for it.
Daily Report Online | Commentary
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | February 12, 2018
An attorney's goal is to both protect against and limit the impact of the inadvertent disclosure of privileged materials. There are several ways that attorneys can accomplish that goal by addressing the risk before disclosure happens.
By Caitlin L. Bronner | February 9, 2018
It has been more than two years since Rule 34 was amended, and practitioners need to be mindful of this amendment.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Rena Andoh and James Salem | February 9, 2018
Does each individual text message in a chain require a separate foundation and basis for admissibility? Examination of available case law suggests that the answer is yes.
By Karen Sloan | February 8, 2018
The American Bar Association and Western Michigan University Cooley Law School are in a discovery fight, with Cooley seeking the confidential accreditation records of other schools dating back to 2010.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By David M. Barshay | February 8, 2018
In his No-Fault Insurance Law Wrap-Up, David M. Barshay analyzes two cases, one tackling issues with questions at an examination under oath, and another presenting a scenario wherein a non-moving party not only failed to oppose a motion, but apparently agreed to the order granting the motion.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Kevin P. Allen | February 8, 2018
Two recent decisions from the Pennsylvania Superior Court appear inconsistent and irreconcilable with respect to a trial court's in camera review of documents subject to a claim of privilege. In one case, the Superior Court rebuked the trial court for not conducting an in camera review and suggested that in camera review by trial courts of allegedly privilege documents is required in Yocabet v. UPMC Presbyterian, 119 A.3d 1012 (Pa. Super. 2015).
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...