Defendant landlord sought summary judgment in plaintiff residential tenant's action for damages suffered after a fire at her rented home. The court granted summary judgment in defendant's favor on plaintiff's breach of contract and negligence claims but denied summary judgment as to plaintiff's claim alleging wrongful retention of her security deposit.

Defendant was not prejudiced by calling witness granted immunity to the stand where the witness refused questions as the jury could not infer, and was not explicitly informed, that the witness had asserted their privilege against self-incrimination. Conviction affirmed.

Plaintiff appealed the court's order denying its motion for post-trial relief. The court concluded that it did not err in denying plaintiff recovery for amounts allegedly owed by a customer where it failed to offer consistent, properly-calculated, and complete evidence of the customer's alleged outstanding debt.

Court affirmed Federal Aviation Administration approval of new airport terminal construction where the record supported the FAA's determination that the project would not independently cause an adverse environmental impact and where the project had independent utility due to the complete inadequacy of the existing terminal.

Industrial Accident Board did not err in denying workers' compensation claim for COVID-19 where it weighed the evidence to determine that it was more likely that worker was infected outside of work rather than at work.

Appellants challenged the court's order denying their appeal of a final determination of the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office that had granted their document request in part pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed and the appeal denied where the appeal was untimely filed and was unsupported on the merits of appellants' claims that they were provided an inauthentic document and that City acted in bad faith in handling their document request.

Streamline Solutions petitioned to vacate an arbitration award entered in favor of Green and Trumbo in their action alleging they were sold a defective house. The court concluded that the Superior Court should affirm its order denying the petition to vacate and affirming the arbitration award.

Court dismissed pro se complaint as unintelligible and barred by res judicata.

FERC commissioners' statements following deadlock over proposed tariff were sufficient to demonstrate that the agency's "action through inaction" found the tariff just and reasonable.

Court Finds No Duty of Care in Premises Liability Claim for Trespasser