Limitations Period on Civil Rights Claims Arising from Wrongful Conviction Did Not Begin Until Conviction Was Vacated

Court vacates its original order and affirms validity of a probated sentence for firearm possession by a felon

Broad Language of Insurance Coverage Exclusion Clause Meant That Exclusion Applied Even When Underlying Claim Was Tangentially Related to Insured's Activity

Petitioner challenged the finding he failed to conform to standards of acceptable veterinary practice pursuant to §21(11) of the Veterinary Medicine Practice Act and court found state's expert's testimony did not violate petitioner's right to due process by intermingling prosecutorial and adjudicatory functions and substantial competent evidence supported finding petitioner fell below the standard of practice by failing to recommend X-rays for ailing dog but board improperly found petitioner fell below the standard by failing to recom

A criminal defendant, who argued on appeal that the trial court erred in denying a pro se motion to substitute federal habeas counsel, failed to prove the appellate court had jurisdiction to hear the case.

Defendants appealed the denial of their motion to set aside a sheriff's sale in a residential foreclosure.

HUD Secretary Granted Default Judgment of Foreclosure, Sale in Reverse Mortgage Case

Court Grants Motion to Strike Verified Claim of Ownership where Deadline was Missed

Court denied employer defendant's preliminary objections to plaintiff employees' employment law action arising out of a wrongful termination claim. Plaintiffs argued they were wrongfully terminated from their positions for failure to return to work while their county was still in the "Red Phase" of Governor Wolf's executive order closing in-person businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although defendant argued plaintiffs were not entitled to rely on the executive order for the basis of their wrongful termination claim, the court di

Court denied objection to a motion seeking to join an additional defendant where the additional defendant argued joinder was not timely filed. Although the request for joinder was late, the court exercised discretion to allow joinder on the grounds that it was reasonable since late joinder only occurred while the parties made a good-faith effort to settle the matter. Court denied in part and granted in part additional defendant's demurrers to the complaint, finding that defendant did not owe a fiduciary duty by law to plaintiff since