Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
163 results for '* topic:"Corporate Entities"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-07-14
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman, Aaron R. Sims, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; David G. Januszewski, Sheila C. Ramesh, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: James M. Yoch, Jr., Kevin P. Rickert, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin C. Maclay, Todd E. Phillips, Quincy M. Crawford, Nathaniel R. Miller, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, Washington, DC; William M. Kelleher, Phillip A. Giordano, Gordon Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Ira S. Zaroff, Richard M. Zaroff, Zaroff & Zaroff LLP, Garden City, NY; P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., K. Tyler O’Connell, Albert J. Carroll, R. Eric Hacker, Damon B. Ferrara, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69464
Transfer of an ownership interest in a Delaware entity by itself was insufficient to constitute sufficient minimum contacts to support the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction over the foreign transferor and transferee.
Publication Date: 2021-07-14
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Julia B. Klein, Klein LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Matthew F. Davis, Justin T. Hymes, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen M. Baldini, Brian Carney, Stephanie Lindemuth, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D69462
Breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion claims, arising from debtor's failure to exercise his rights to receive distribution pursuant to bankruptcy court order, failed where debtor had not identified a contract or fiduciary duty for defendants to ensure he had notice of the condition precedent to debtor receiving the distribution.
Publication Date: 2021-07-07
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Biotechnology | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Karl Hill, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Gregory Zimmer, New York, NY for petition-er.
for defendant: Richard P. Rollo, Sarah A. Clark, Angela Lam, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Barry Ka-zan, Mintz & Gold LLP, New York, NY; Faith Charles, Thompson Hine LLP, New York, NY for respondents.
Case Number: D69457
Two individuals had been properly appointed to a board of directors in accordance with the procedures set forth in the company's governing documents, so the court granted a motion to dismiss.
Publication Date: 2021-06-09
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rudolf Koch, Matthew W. Murphy, Andrew L. Milam, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Samuel J. Lieberman, Alexander H. McCabe, Sadis & Goldberg LLP, New York, NY; Steven K. Davidson, Mi-chael J. Baratz, Claire Schachter, Lauren Goldschmidt, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: T. Bradley Davey, Matthew F. Davis, Andrew H. Sauder, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jennifer Barrett, Dennis H. Hranitzky, Blair Adams, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69428
The court held that reverse corporate veil piercing was proper where plaintiffs' complaint adequately al-leged that a company's subsidiaries participated in a scheme to deprive plaintiffs of the benefit of their judg-ment.
Publication Date: 2021-05-19
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Consulting
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Shannon, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Philip S. Kaufman, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY for petitioner.
for defendant: Jeremy D. Eicher, Eicher Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; David B. Goldstein, Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., New York, NY for respondent Shawe. Frank E. Noyes, II, Offit Kurman, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Adam K. Bult, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Las Vegas, NV for nominal party TransPerfect Global.
Case Number: D69399
Court-appointed corporate custodian was entitled to reimbursement of fees and expenses incurred in responding to majority owner's frivolous litigation challenging custodian's fee petitions.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Joseph S. Britton
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-04-28
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kurt M. Heyman, Gillian L. Andrews, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gustavo F. Bruckner, Daryoush Behbood, Pomerantz LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, J. Peter Shindel, Jr., Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE for de-fendant.
Case Number: D69378
Shareholder demonstrated a proper purpose for his books and records request, but the court limited the scope of the inspection to formal materials considered by the board.
Publication Date: 2021-04-21
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jacob R. Kirkham, Kobre & Kim LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robin J. Baik, Leif T. Simonson, S. Nathan Park, Kobre & Kim LLP, New York, NY for petitioner.
for defendant: John G. Harris, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stuart Kagen, Russell Bogart, Ka-gen, Caspersen & Bogart PLLC, New York, NY for respondent.
Case Number: D69373
The court found that petitioner had alleged a reasonably conceivable basis upon which judicial dissolution was warranted, so it denied respondent's motion to dismiss.
Publication Date: 2021-03-31
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lewis H. Lazarus, K. Tyler O’Connell, Bryan Townsend, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Aryeh S. Portnoy, Emily Alban, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: S. Mark Hurd, Alexandra M. Cummings, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael T. Sullivan, David E. Danovitch, Clark A. Freeman, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D69345
The plain language of a contract provided that a holder of preferred stock was entitled to dividends at a higher rate in perpetuity.
Publication Date: 2021-03-10
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Blake A. Bennett, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Sam Bonderoff, James Ostaszewski, Matthew Hendrickson, Zamansky LLC, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, John M. Seaman, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69321
Stockholder established a proper purpose for the inspection of corporate books and records, but the court limited the scope of some of the requests.
Publication Date: 2021-02-17
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John L. Reed, Peter H. Kyle, Kelly L. Freund, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Patrick J. Smith, Brian T. Burns, Nicholas J. Karasimas, Smith Villazor LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jon E. Abramczyk, D. McKinley Measley, Alexandra M. Cumings, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69300
Although one member of a limited liability company contrived circumstances leading to a deadlock, the facts established that the parties had an irreconcilable disagreement which warranted dissolution of the com-pany.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read