Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
157 results for '* topic:"Corporate Entities"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-06-10
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Energy
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard I. Werder, Jr., Renita Sharma, Elisabeth B. Miller, and Ryan A. Rakower, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; William M. Lafferty, Thomas W. Briggs, Jr., Daniel T. Menken, and Aubrey J. Morin, Morris Nichols Arsht&Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant Borealis Power Holdings.Neil A. Sterner, Dechert LLP, New York, NY; Blake Rohrbacher, Brian S. Yu, and Kevin M. Regan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellant Cheyne Walk Investments.P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., Ian D. McCauley, and Kathleen A. Murphey, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant Texas Transmission Investment.
for defendant: Jessica B. Pulliam, Monica Hughes Smith, Baker Botts L.L.P., Dallas, Texas; Vernon Cassin, Baker Botts L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; Peter J. Walsh Jr., J. Matthew Belger, Andrew H. Sauder, Potter Anderson &Corroon LLP, Wilmington Delaware for Hunt Strategic Utility Investment, L.L.C. J. Christopher Shore, Alice Tsier, andVivake Prasad, White & Case LLP, New York, NY; Aaron Colodny, White & Case LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David C. McBride, Martin S. Lessner, Ryan M. Bartley, and Paul J. Loughman, Young, Conaway, Stargatt& Taylor, LLC, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D69006
Right of first refusal in separate investor rights agreement did not supersede right of first offer on transfer of equity stake in separate corporate entity where the right of first refusal only applied to minority member of the company subject to the investor rights agreement and transferor was not a minority member.
Publication Date: 2020-06-03
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Retail
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John L. Williamsand Brian C. Crawford, The Williams Law Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: John A. Sensing, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Greg S. Zuckerand Michael B. Weitman, Westerman Ball Ederer Miller Zucker & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D68998
Remote controller's efforts to amend operating agreement to benefit himself at the expense of another interest holder, without that interest holder's knowledge or consent, could give rise to a possible breach of fiduciary duty claim.
Publication Date: 2020-05-27
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael F. Bonkowski and Andrew L. Cole, Cole Schotz P.C., Wilmington, DE; Roger A. Lane and Courtney Worcester, Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: T. Brad Davey and Mathew A. Golden, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Barry S. Pollack and Joshua L. Solomon, Pollack Solomon Duffy LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.
Case Number: D68995
In this books and records request matter, the court held that plaintiff was entitled to certain documents to value his interest, but the court denied other aspects of his request.
Publication Date: 2020-05-13
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter B. Ladig and Brett M. McCartney, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; William T. Reid IV, Michael Yoder, Jordan L. Vimont, and Ryan M. Goldstein, Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, Austin, TX for defendants.
Case Number: D68974
Liquidating trustee reasonably concluded that one asset purchase bid was superior to the other where the accepted bid was an all-cash offer that would help the company's depleted cash reserves and where the rejected bid had an unacceptable risk component as to the bidder's ability to commercialize the company's IP to pay the royalty component.
Publication Date: 2020-05-13
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Shannon, Christopher N. Kelly, Mathew A. Golden, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kahn A. Scolnick, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Lindsey S. Young, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard P. Rollo, John T. Miraglia, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68976
Individual defendants dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction where their contractual consent to certain equitable remedies did not constitute a waiver of jurisdictional defenses.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Joseph S. Britton
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-04-29
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Insurance | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian W. Shaffer and John M. Lupton IV of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jami B. Nimeroff, Brown McGarry Nimeroff , Wilmington, DE; Mary Kay Brown and Raymond McGarry of Brown McGarry Nimeroff LLC, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68961
The court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants under either the state's long-arm statute or a forum selection clause contained in a stockholder agreement. Motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2020-04-15
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant: Edward McNally and Kathleen Murphy, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants and intervenor.
Case Number: D68949
Defendants breached their fiduciary duty in calculating the value of plaintiff's interest in a limited liability company at zero, so the court awarded damages to plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2020-04-15
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey Gorris, Christopher Foulds, and Christopher P. Quinn, Friedlander & Gorris P.A., Wilmington, DE; William Savitt, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert S. Saunders, Jennifer C. Voss, Arthur R. Bookout, and Jessica R. Kunz, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68944
Complaint dismissed where parties had agreed to arbitration clause that included broad delegation provision, which was not void or unconscionable simply because parent corporation had dictated terms to subsidiary.
Publication Date: 2020-04-01
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis G.X. Pileggi, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Michael G. Platner, John S. Poulos and Vincent F. Alexander, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Andrew D. Cordo, Shannon E. German, Nora M. Crawford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE ; Mat-thew A. Feldman, Todd G. Cosenza, Charles D. Cording, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D68931
An entity that had only an indirect equity interest in a limited liability company did not qualify to seek statutory dissolution of the LLC because it was neither a member nor a manager, and it was not entitled to dissolve the company as a matter of equity. Motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2020-02-12
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Craig Martin and Kelly L. Freund, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Ryan D. Stottmann, and Coleen W. Hill, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D68872
Chancery court erred in applying foreign law when defendants failed to meet their burden to establish the law, and thus erred in ruling that a forum clause was mandatory rather than permissive, since the clause was permissive under the applicable Delaware law.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read