Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
272 results for '* topic:"Patent Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-07-26
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Blake A. Bennett, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Dennis D. Murrell, Robert J. Theuerkauf, Daniel W. Redding, Middleton Reutlinger; Louisville, KY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Dorronda R. Bordley, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edgar H. Haug, Robert E. Colletti, Roman Khasidov, Mark Basanta, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69897
Patent term referring to "static stability" was not indefinite where the term had a definite meaning that was well-understood within the art.
Publication Date: 2022-05-31
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Booker, Robert M. Oakes, Nitika G. Fiorella, Kelly A. Del Dotto, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Elizabeth M. Flanagan, Michael J. Kane, Ryan V. Petty, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN; W. Chad Shear, K. Nicole Williams, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA; John M. Farrell, Fish & Richardson P.C., Redwood City, CA; Caitlin M. Dean, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Laura E. Powell, Fish & Richardson P.C., Washington, DC; Jason Leonard, Vincent Li, McDermott Will & Emory, New York, NY; Lisa M. Ferri, Manuel J. Velez, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Charles B. Klein, Jovial Wong, Claire A. Fundakowski, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Alison M. King, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69833
Patent infringement claims arising from manufacture of pharmaceutical generic product failed where abbreviated new drug application expressly excluded use of form of active ingredient that was protected by patent claims, and where plaintiffs failed to submit evidence showing that any amount of patent-protected claim would be generated by the manufacturing process.
Publication Date: 2022-05-31
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Jonathan S. Caplan, Aaron M. Frankel, Marcus A. Colucci, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, MORRIS, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; William F. Lee, Sarah B. Petty, Kate Saxton, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA; Amy Kreiger Wigmore, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mary (Mindy) V. Sooter, Nora Q.E. Passamaneck, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Denver, CO for defendant.
Case Number: D69837
Jury verdict of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents overturned where plaintiff's expert failed to offer a linking argument between the patent claims and the alleged equivalent infringing product, but instead merely offered generalized and conclusory testimony about their similarity.
Publication Date: 2022-05-17
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Omerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Seth Ard, Beatrice Franklin, Max Straus, Susman Godfrey, LLP, New York, NY; John Lahad, Ibituroko-Emi Lawson, Robert Travis Korman, Brenda Adimora, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Kalpana Srinivasan, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Kemper Diehl, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jeremy D. Anderson, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Steven R. Katz, Jacob Pecht, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Boston, MA; R. Andrew Schewentker, Fish & Richardson P.C., Washington, DC; Eda Stark, Fish & Richardson P.C., Atlanta, GA; Kenneth L. Dorsney, Cortlan S. Hitch, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian C. Riopelle, David E. Finkelson, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA; Jason W. Cook, McGuireWoods LLP, Dallas, TX; David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, Stephanie E. O’Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert W. Unikel, Michelle Marek Figueiredo, John Cotiguala, Matt Lind, Paul Hastings LLP, Chicago, IL; Robert R. Laurenzi, Chad J. Peterman, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, NY; Arielle Bratton, Paul Hastings LLP, San Diego, CA; Ginger Anders, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC; Rodger D. Smith II, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffri A. Kaminski, Justin E. Pierce, Calvin R. Nelson, Venable LLP, Washington, DC; Neha Bhat, Venable LLP, New York, NY; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Frank C. Cimino Jr., Megan S. Woodworth, Jeffri A. Kaminsi, Calvin R. Nelson, Neha Bhat, Venable, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D69819
Court denied defendants' motions for summary judgment of non-infringement where the evidence created a triable issue as to whether defendants' accused products met the claim limitation of a "document" because the product applications could have permitted users to edit files in the application.
Publication Date: 2022-01-18
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam W. Poff, Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael D. Specht, Byron L. Pickard, Richard M. Bemben, Daniel S. Block, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Megan E. Dellinger, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sarah Chapin Columbia, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Boston, MA; Ian B. Brooks, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Washington, DC; Jiaxiao Zhang, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Irvine, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D69685
Jury improperly issued a verdict for plaintiff on its Lanham Act false advertising claim, where plaintiff presented no evidence that customers were actually deceived by defendant's alleged false advertising.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-11-02
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Brian R. Lemon, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gerald F. Ivey, Mareesa A. Frederick, Elizabeth D. Ferrill, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Elliot C. Cook, J. Derek McCorquindale, Alexander M. Boyer, David N. Lefcowitz, Luke H. MacDonald, Joseph M. Schaffner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Michael J. Flynn, Andrew M. Moshos, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Hueston, Douglas J. Dixon, Christina V. Rayburn, Sourabh Mishra, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Newport Beach, CA; Christine Woodin, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D69597
Because there was an issue of fact in this patent infringement suit as to whether defendant's design and plaintiff's product's design were substantially similar, defendant's motion for summary judgment failed.
Publication Date: 2021-11-02
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; F. Dominic Cerrito, Eric C. Stops, Evangeline Shih, Andrew S. Chalson, Gabriel P. Brier, Frank C. Calvosa, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel M. Silver, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kenneth G. Schuler, Marc N. Zubick, Alex Grabowski, Sarah W. Wang, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL; Herman Yue, Bornali Rashmi Borah, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69594
Defendants' counterclaim which sought delisting of plaintiff's patent from the Orange Book was ripe for adjudication even if defendant had not certified against the listed patent.
Publication Date: 2021-10-13
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Kenneth J. Nachbar, Ryan D. Stottmann, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Miranda N. Gilbert, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jeffrey L. Moyer, Kelly E. Farnan, Blake Rohrbacher, Valerie A. Caras, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ben Hattenbach, Iian D. Jablon, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case Number: D69572
The court dismissed this action for declaratory relief because plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law in other pending patent lawsuits.
Publication Date: 2021-10-06
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam R. Brausa, Timothy C. Saulsbury, Vera Ranieri, Raghav R. Krishnapriyan, Eric C. Wiener, Whitney R. O’Byrne, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA; Daniel M. Silver, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: James R. Nuttall, Michael Dockterman, Robert F. Kappers, Tron Fu, Katherine H. Johnson, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Chicago, IL; Christopher A. Suarez, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC; Timothy Devlin, Robert Kiddie, Devlin Law Firm LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69565
The court granted portions of the parties' cross-motions on summary judgment in this patent infringement matter, but it denied the parties' motions to limit expert testimony.
Publication Date: 2020-11-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lexie G. White, Hunter Vance, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Andreas C. Healy, Jenna G. Farleigh, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John V. Gorman, Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Robert C. Bertin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Yar R. Chaikovsky, Bruce Yen, Alexander H. Lee, Radhesh Devendran, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Taylor Ludlam, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC: Steven D. Moore; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Russel A. Korn, Richard W. Goldstucker, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case Number: D69174
Defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent infringement claims denied where evidence could allow jury to find that patents-in-suit were directed to patentable subject matter and that the accused products infringed upon the patent claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read