Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The court used alternative reasoning to affirm the OAGs denial of a RTKL request for a report generated by a law firm investigating crimes arising from or related to the commonwealths email system because while the OAG argued that the report was exempt under the attorney-client and attorney-work-product privileges and the predecisional and noncriminal investigation exemptions, the court focused on whether the appendices sought were part of the record and encompassed by the RTKL request at the time the request was made. Affirmed.
Trial court properly dismissed appellants claims against wholesale market managing company based on a controlling employer argument derived from an OSHA compliance directive after appellant was injured by a pallet jack driven by his own employee because the policy appellant relied on did not determine rights or obligations or cause legal consequences and concerned only the scope of enforcement of OHSA requirements and managing company had assumed no duty regarding safety in the leased areas of the market
Trial courts orders denying constables petitions for the appointment of deputy constables based on the lack of MDJ and district attorney signatures were vacated and remanded for the trial court to consider the petitions under the new administrative order court had issued while the appeal was pending with new procedures for appointing deputy constables. Order vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2017-10-31 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1611
Trial court erred in granting parents request for de novo hearing in dependency petition after orphans court had accepted masters report, when parent failed to object to hearing before master and had not shown cause for rehearing, and thus had no right to rehearing before trial judge. Order of the trial court reversed.
Township did not err in granting final land development plan approval where applicant was not required under townships SALDO to obtain necessary zoning permits prior to seeking application approval. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Trial court erred in sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer when it considered averments outside of the complaint whose sufficiency was being tested. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Obtaining a remand for a new IDEA due process hearing was a vindication of rights that conferred prevailing party status and rendered the party eligible for an award of legal fees and costs under IDEAs fee-shifting provisions. Order of the district court reversed, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2017-10-31 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Moulton Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1612
Motion to suppress statements properly denied where, although defendant was initially illegally detained on an inactive warrant, any taint from the illegal arrest was attenuated where defendant voluntarily waived Miranda rights to make statements in response to co-defendants incriminating statements and evidence obtained from a search warrant thereunder. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Office of Unemployment Compensation Tax Services was not subject to statutory deadline to issue revised rates where employer contributed to delay. Order of the Department of Labor and Industry affirmed.
Workers compensation appeal board properly denied the application for supersedeas fund reimbursement because the final outcome of the proceedings determined that compensation was payable and resolution of that issue did not hinge upon which of two carriers was responsible for the payment of compensation or whether the liable carrier had entered into a compromise and release agreement. Affirmed.