• In re J'K.M.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-17
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Shogan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0831

    Trial court erred in refusing to appoint a separate guardian ad litem, in case where attorney was both child's attorney and GAL, because 16 year-old child and GAL had diametrically opposed positions on child's placement and the divergent opinions constituted a conflict. Reversed.

  • Hvizdak v. Linn

    Publication Date: 2018-07-10
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0810

    Trial court properly dismissed husband's complaint seeking to recuse the entire Butler County bench and asserting RICO, abuse of process and wrongful use of civil proceedings against wife and her attorneys. Affirmed.

  • In re: AD1, AD2 and AB

    Publication Date: 2018-07-10
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Linhardt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0774

    While father demonstrated love for his three children, the record established that he failed to perform his parental duties for a period of at least six months immediately preceding the filing of a petition to terminate parental rights during father's incarceration and concurrent lack of effort to contact or care for the children. The court granted a petition to involuntarily terminate father's parental rights.

  • Hanrahan v. Bakker

    Publication Date: 2018-07-10
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Baer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0767

    Courts obligated to consider reasonable needs of children in determining support obligations in high-income cases. Order of the superior court vacated, case remanded.

  • In the Interest of A.J.K.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0794

    Trial court properly terminated father's parental rights because Department of Human Services presented clear and convincing evidence for termination under §§2511(a)(1), (2), (5) and (8) where the record supported the factual findings that father did not have the capacity to parent the child and that termination was in the child's best interests. Affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Insurance Law 2024

    Authors: George J. Kenny, Frank A. Lattal

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of T.J.J.M.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Ott
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0795

    Trial court abused its discretion in changing child's placement goal to adoption and in involuntarily terminating father's parental rights because the goal change occurred when child had been in placement less than the statutory 15-22 months and omitted any findings as to father's compliance and testimony demonstrated that the causes of father's parental incapacity could be removed. Vacated and remanded.

  • S.S. v. K.F.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-26
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0764

    Trial court abused its discretion in ordering children to remain enrolled in a school district where neither parent lived and ordering the parties to pay the resulting tuition because neither parent requested or expected that result when mother filed a relocation petition and the trial court made little inquiry into the parties' financial situations. Vacated and remanded.

  • Wong v. Li

    Publication Date: 2018-06-19
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Carpenter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0731

    Plaintiff failed to establish that the attorney for her former husband in a divorce proceeding engaged in conduct which constituted an abuse of process. The trial court properly entered a directed verdict against plaintiff.

  • In re: Estates of Berg

    Publication Date: 2018-06-12
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry: Accounting
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Herron
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-06780

    The court permanently removed accountant Gloria Byars as guardian of the estates of two elderly persons where she engaged in self-dealing and breached her fiduciary duties and imposed a surcharge for her misconduct, while also warning the Philadelphia Corporation for Aging to conduct due diligence before nominating guardians to protect the elderly and incapacitated. The court sustained objector's objections.

  • Bidwell v. Bidwell

    Publication Date: 2018-06-12
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Sibum
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0672

    Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11(c) did not disqualify wife's attorney in this divorce action, though counsel was involved in the prosecution of the defendant husband during her prior work for a district attorney's office, because the two matters were not substantially similar. The court denied defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's attorney.