Filter This View

  • Hanrahan v. Bakker

    Publication Date: 2018-07-10
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Baer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0767

    Courts obligated to consider reasonable needs of children in determining support obligations in high-income cases. Order of the superior court vacated, case remanded.

  • In the Interest of A.J.K.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0794

    Trial court properly terminated father's parental rights because Department of Human Services presented clear and convincing evidence for termination under §§2511(a)(1), (2), (5) and (8) where the record supported the factual findings that father did not have the capacity to parent the child and that termination was in the child's best interests. Affirmed.

  • In the Interest of T.J.J.M.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Ott
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0795

    Trial court abused its discretion in changing child's placement goal to adoption and in involuntarily terminating father's parental rights because the goal change occurred when child had been in placement less than the statutory 15-22 months and omitted any findings as to father's compliance and testimony demonstrated that the causes of father's parental incapacity could be removed. Vacated and remanded.

  • S.S. v. K.F.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-26
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0764

    Trial court abused its discretion in ordering children to remain enrolled in a school district where neither parent lived and ordering the parties to pay the resulting tuition because neither parent requested or expected that result when mother filed a relocation petition and the trial court made little inquiry into the parties' financial situations. Vacated and remanded.

  • Wong v. Li

    Publication Date: 2018-06-19
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Carpenter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0731

    Plaintiff failed to establish that the attorney for her former husband in a divorce proceeding engaged in conduct which constituted an abuse of process. The trial court properly entered a directed verdict against plaintiff.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of California Employment Law Forms

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re: Estates of Berg

    Publication Date: 2018-06-12
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry: Accounting
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Herron
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-06780

    The court permanently removed accountant Gloria Byars as guardian of the estates of two elderly persons where she engaged in self-dealing and breached her fiduciary duties and imposed a surcharge for her misconduct, while also warning the Philadelphia Corporation for Aging to conduct due diligence before nominating guardians to protect the elderly and incapacitated. The court sustained objector's objections.

  • Bidwell v. Bidwell

    Publication Date: 2018-06-12
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Sibum
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0672

    Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11(c) did not disqualify wife's attorney in this divorce action, though counsel was involved in the prosecution of the defendant husband during her prior work for a district attorney's office, because the two matters were not substantially similar. The court denied defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's attorney.

  • K.G. v. Dep't of Human Serv.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-05
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Leavitt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0662

    Mother's challenge to the secretary's order denying her request for reconsideration of department decision to dismiss her appeal of an in-dicated report of child abuse was denied because mother failed to respond to the rule to show cause or to timely petition for review of the dismissal of her appeal and neither her petition for review nor her brief addressed the validity of the secretary's decision and thus, her challenge to the validity of that decision was waived. Affirmed.

  • Thompson v. Thompson

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Shogan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0582

    The trial court erred in incorporating stipulations between plaintiff and domestic relations office over the arrears in her child support into its order because the agreement imposed an illegal indefinitely suspended sentence and trial court also erred in failing to grant in forma pauperis status. Reversed and vacated.

  • In the Interest of: N.B., a minor

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Dubow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0627

    Suppression of confession was properly granted where juvenile's Miranda waiver was involuntary since he did not understand significance of Miranda warnings and believed he was obligated to follow his mother's instruction to confess to police. Order of the trial court affirmed.