Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Following multidistrict litigation cases related to the opioid crisis, appellees, Dallas County and Bexar County, sued various manufacturers, distributors, and retail pharmacies, alleging negligence and violation of the standard of care in dispensing opioids.
Following the breakdown in a romantic relationship between the parties, appellee filed a petition alleging psychological harm, criminal trespassing, and threats of defamation by appellant, supported by texts and emails.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, sued defendants claiming that emergency room patients were charged an evaluation fee without an agreement to do so or notification that the fee would be charged.
Appellee sought to collect uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits under her policy with appellant, who denied coverage under the policy's regular-use exclusion.
Appellants held royalty interests for gas "at the well" and objected to royalties paid that accounted for gas used in post-production costs of bringing the gas to market which reduced the volume of gas brought out of the ground.