Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2018-06-26 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge McLaughlin Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0764
Trial court abused its discretion in ordering children to remain enrolled in a school district where neither parent lived and ordering the parties to pay the resulting tuition because neither parent requested or expected that result when mother filed a relocation petition and the trial court made little inquiry into the parties' financial situations. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2018-06-26 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Kunselman Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0763
Trial court erred in finding appellant in contempt for having "access" to a rifle in a shed in violation of a Protect from Abuse order because there was no proof that appellant had constructive possession of the rifle or that he had a wrongful intent to violate the PFA. Vacated.
The plaintiff client produced sufficient evidence to raise material issues of fact regarding whether the defendant attorney failed to exercise ordinary skill and knowledge while representing plaintiff's interests in a contempt proceeding. The court denied the parties' motions for summary judgment.
Defendant's designation as a sexual violent predator was unconstitutional in the wake precedent finding that such a designation constitutes a criminal punishment and that a factual finding that increases the length of his registration period must be found by a reasonable doubt by the chosen factfinder. The appellate court reversed in part defendant's judgment of sentence.
Balance of equities favored transfer of venue where most of defendant employer's activities occurred in proposed transfer district and as such the events giving rise to the action and most of the witnesses were located in the district. Defendant's motion to transfer venue granted.
Publication Date: 2018-06-26 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0758
PCRA petition properly dismissed as untimely where after-discovered evidence previously available to defendant and new constitutional rule inapplicable. Order of the PCRA court affirmed.
Board erred in finding that claimant had waived the right to challenge the constitutionality of the impairment rating evaluation because she was entitled to seek modification of her disability status based on the Protz decisions where she filed her petition within three years from the date of her last payment of compensation as permitted by §413(a). Vacated and remanded.
U.S. Attorney General enjoined from denying federal grant funds for city's purported refusal to comply with immigration-related conditions where such statutory compliance requirement ran afoul of the anticommandeering doctrine. Judgment granted to plaintiff.
Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the parents of an adult shooter who was allegedly a feeble-minded adult provided sufficient factual support for imposing a duty upon the parents to exercise reasonable care with respect to their son's access to their firearms. The court denied defendants' preliminary objection demurrers to plaintiffs' negligence claims.
The court resolved the conflict between the collective bargaining agreements at issue and the city ordinances regarding a participant's minimum age and years of service required consistent with the language of the city ordinances and, thus, found that petitioner, a city firefighter, had not yet reached an age at which he was entitled to full retirement benefits. The court denied petitioner's appeal.