Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2018-03-06 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Wojcik Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0222
Parole board correctly added remainder of original sentence, restarting from date of offenders return to the boards custody, following the offenders violation of parole. Order of the Board of Probation and Parole affirmed; counsels application to withdraw granted.
Trial court erred in reversing zoning hearing boards denial of a special exception to put up a 150-foot wireless communications tower because tower company failed to show that it was licensed by the FCC to operate the towers. Reversed.
A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, which represented a middle ground between the economic ranges proffered by the parties experts, did not shock the courts sense of justice or represent a plainly excessive or exorbitant award to plaintiff, who could not work as a cosmetologist as she had planned. The court denied defendants motion for remittitur.
PennDOT was not immune from suit in this case, as plaintiffs allegations that PennDOT created a dangerous condition by negligently designing and installing a dangerous guardrail fit squarely within the Sovereign Immunity Acts real estate exception. The court reversed the intermediate court and remanded.
Trial court erred as a matter of law in sustaining drivers appeal of the three month suspension of his operating privileges for violating §1786(f), operating a vehicle without the required financial responsibility, because driver pled guilty to violating §1786(f) and admitted that he did not obtain insurance until 17 minutes after the traffic stop was initiated. Reversed.
The trial court properly found that township lacked authority to zone out a public utility pipeline service or facility regulated by the PUC based on field preemption and conflict preemption, statutory analysis showed the general assembly intended the PUC to be preeminent in regulation of public utilities and plaintiffs arguments based on the townships constitutional duties under the ERA were not persuasive. Affirmed.
The evidence at trial was sufficient to find defendant guilty of driving too slow for conditions in violation of 75 Pa.C.S. §3364(a) where the arresting officer observed defendant cause a traffic jam due to her slow driving and credibly disputed defendants claim that another vehicle caused her to drive too slowly. The court denied defendants motion for judgment of acquittal.
Police violated defendants constitutional rights when they searched his cell phone for information in a criminal investigation without a warrant. The court reversed the intermediate appellate court and remanded.
On a criminal defendants pre-trial motions, the court ruled that: 1) defendant was entitled to have defense subpoenas sealed until the time of trial; 2) defendant could confront the commonwealths witness regarding his parole status; and 3) defendant could introduce evidence regarding decedents prior bad acts.
The court granted defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding plaintiffs breach of fiduciary duty and accounting claims, because plaintiffs failed to timely file a responsive pleading to the factual allegations contained in defendants answer and new matter.