Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Mothers proposed relocation with two of the parties minor children from Pennsylvania to Delaware was not in the best interests of the children, but the court denied fathers motion to modify custody.
Defendant was not entitled to post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel, because defendants guilty plea was made voluntarily, and defendant failed to meet his burden of proving other claims of ineffectiveness by his trial counsel.
Plaintiff could not use the Manufactured Home Act to exercise any rights regarding a manufactured home abandoned on his property. The appellate court affirmed a trial court order denying plaintiff relief.
Department properly denied plaintiff eye hospitals application to enroll in Medicare as a hospital because department correctly considered comparative volume among the facts and circumstances, comparative volume was not a new standard and had been applied and explained in publicly available decisions prior to plaintiffs application and notice and comment was not required. Motion granted.
The hills and ridges doctrine barred plaintiff from holding the defendant property owner liable for injuries he suffered in a slip and fall accident on the property where it was undisputed that plaintiff slipped and fell in the middle of a blizzard. The appellate court affirmed an order granting defendant summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2018-02-20 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Bender Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0173
Petitioner entitled to expungement of PFA records, as a matter of law, where no finding of abuse made in any of the PFA proceedings. Order of the trial court reversed.
The evidence of record raised a material issue of fact for the jury regarding whether the defendant landowner retained sufficient control over an independent contractors work to warrant liability in this case involving personal injury to the independent contractors employee. The court denied defendants motion for summary judgment.
Defendant was entitled to either have negotiated plea with specific sentence enforced by sentencing court or be permitted to withdraw guilty plea, and plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise defendant of remedies to sentencing courts failure to abide by plea agreement. Order of the PCRA court reversed, case remanded.
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment in plaintiffs action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, unjust enrichment and tortious interference with economic advantage because plaintiffs admission in its German litigation and its 28 U.S.C. §1782 discovery action against defendant showed that plaintiff knew or should have known of the factual basis for the misappropriation claim by 2009 but did not file the action until 2014 and the action was time barred. Motion granted.
Trial court erred in holding that 85 acres used for an intermodal railroad facility was exempt from the PURTA tax and the case was remanded for the trial court to determine the amount of acreage used for certain specified uses of the property and whether any or all of that acreage satisfied the exemption in §1101-A(3)(ii). Vacated and remanded.