Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2018-02-13 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0134
The DNA evidence produced at trial strongly implicated defendant as a possessor of a gun found in the basement of his approved residence and the fact that other family members may have also handled the gun did not preclude defendants constructive possession. The court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment where plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts regarding rescission, misrepresentation, unfair trade practices, or breach of express or implied warranty involving the sale of a used lawnmower.
Publication Date: 2018-02-13 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0137
Foster parent lacked standing to intervene in dependency hearing, after being decertified as a foster parent and failing to take any steps toward adoption, but was merely entitled to notice of hearing and an opportunity to be heard. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Plaintiff permitted to attempt service by international certified mail, return receipt requested, where service under Hague Convention unsuccessful and foreign jurisdiction did not prohibit service by certified mail. Plaintiffs motion for leave to effect service by alternative means granted in part.
Bankruptcy court erred in holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred it from considering trustees fraudulent transfer claims over the revocation of debtors slot machine license because bankruptcy court applied the doctrine too broadly in finding that trustees claims required the federal courts to void the state court order revoking the license. Reversed.
Superior court erred in considering appellants appeal of the trial court order disallowing the presence of appellants counsel during the standardized portion of a neuropsychological examination because the order was not an appealable order as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 313 where the order met only one of the three prongs of the collateral order doctrine. Vacated.
Plaintiff delayed in seeking to re-schedule a discovery deposition of a doctor in a medical malpractice case, but the court allowed the discovery anyway because it found no prejudice to defendants. The court denied other discovery that was unrelated to the malpractice action.
Defendant drug companies were not entitled to JNOV in plaintiffs failure to warn action because plaintiffs expert used a generally accepted scientific process to conclude that defendants drug caused plaintiffs gynecomastia, the trial court properly instructed the jury on combined negligence and properly refused to instruct the jury on plaintiffs future damages claim and the evidence fully supported the jurys decision but the coordinating judge erred in granting a global motion barring punitive damages claims. Affirmed in part, r
The plaintiffs lawsuit, filed under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution and seeking a declaratory judgment that the state legislature exceeded its authority under the federal constitution when it enacted a congressional redistricting plan, was not justiciable because the court could not assume the roles of state and federal legislatures. The court entered judgment for defendants.
Publication Date: 2018-02-06 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0108
Minor sexual abuse victim properly permitted to testify via CCTV where trial court heard testimony from treating psychotherapist that victim suffered from depression and PTSD, feared facing her abuser in court, and accordingly would be negatively impacted in her ability to testify by defendants presence. Judgment of sentence affirmed.