Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The Reading Township Board of Supervisors reasons for denying applicants request for approval of an intermunicipal transfer of a liquor license pursuant to 47 P.S. 4-461(b.3) were not supported by substantial evidence where there was no objective evidence that granting the request would be contrary to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the township.
Respondent was suspended for a period of three months because he violated RPC 1.1 and RPC 1.3 by failing to take action in his clients civil case to enjoin a non-judicial eviction for breach of contract.
A former employee failed to state sufficient facts to support a claim for fraud in the inducement where there was no evidence of a false statement or an intent to mislead.
Defendant waived the right to challenge his consent to a blood test that led to charges of driving under the influence by failing to file his motion to suppress in a timely fashion in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Courts decision Birchfield v. North Dakota. The court denied defendants motion to suppress without holding a hearing.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Wecht Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1557
Residential search warrant lacked probable cause where it was unsupported by tailored, individualized facts regarding the subject of the search indicating that evidence relating to the crime would be found at the residence, but such error was harmless where other evidence overwhelmingly established guilt.
Plaintiffs amended complaint sufficiently pled a claim of corporate negligence against the defendant nursing home where the five factors set forth Althaus v. Cohen, as applied here.
The trial courts rulings in a criminal case regarding eyewitness identification, demonstrative evidence and expert testimony were not in error, and defendant was not entitled to relief from the sentence imposed.
Suppression of wiretap evidence not warranted where police adopted reasonable intercept minimization plan requiring monitors to switch off and spot check.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1559
Detective erroneously permitted to testify as to meaning of street language where not a participant in the conversation, or qualified as an expert.