Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The district court erred in finding that it lacked federal admiralty jurisdiction over tort claims arising out of a drunken brawl that erupted on a cruise ship docking off the Delaware River.
Breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims arising from retailers termination of rewards program during terms of customers memberships failed where program agreement permitted retailed to alter or terminate the program at any time and stated that membership fees were nonrefundable.
Plaintiffs were required to arbitrate their grievance with their employer in accordance with the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and they could not circumvent this exhaustion-of-remedy requirement in the absence of any allegations of conspiracy between their employer and their union. The court denied plaintiffs motion to stay arbitration.
Workers compensation board erred in reversing the WCJs findings that decedent was on a special assignment for employer when he was killed in an automobile accident because decedent was a traveling employee and on special assignment at the time of the accident.
A volunteer fire company qualified as a local agency for purposes of Pennsylvanias Right to Know Law, and it was required to provide requested meeting minutes and financial documents regarding loan transactions
Trial court erred in overruling DOTs preliminary objections to the claims of decedents mother and children for loss of future services and financial support because the sovereign immunity act barred a parent or child from recovering damages for the loss of decedents future services and financial support in a wrongful death action.
Trial court erred in finding appellant beneficiary and executor of estate personally liable for bill for animal feed delivered to farm business owned by estate because there was no legal theory to justify extending piercing the corporate veil.
In this action to collect on a credit card account, the court granted defendants motions to dismiss because plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to show it was the real party in interest, and the complaint and exhibit did not adequately set forth the credit agreement and the history of the charges
Publication Date: 2017-10-17 Practice Area:Civil Procedure Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Solano Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1927
The trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs petition to open a judgment of non-pros without considering lesser sanctions, the potential prejudice to defendants and, inter alia, whether counsels mistake in failing to appear was part of a pattern of misconduct.
Court found that the county seal violated the establishment clause under the Lemon endorsement test because the undisputed original purpose for including the cross on the seal was not secular.