Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Superior Court properly affirmed trial courts denial of appellants motion in limine to bar the evidence of pedestrians BAC, in automobile accident that killed pedestrian, because the BAC evidence was admissible if the trial court determined that it reasonably established a pedestrians unfitness to cross the street.
Trial court did not err in sentencing juvenile defendant to a life sentence while also imposing a minimum term-of-years sentence, because it would grant the juvenile the possibility of parole following completion of the minimum sentence.
The court found the evidence sufficient to establish that the victim suffered bodily injury as defined by the simple assault statute in an altercation with defendant.
Testimonial evidence of sexual penetration of a victim under 16 years old sufficient to support conviction for indecent assault. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
The Commonwealth Court erred in holding that appellants claim that the general assembly failed to provide the resources called for in the constitutions education clause and their equal protection claims based on disparities in school district funding were non-justiciable political questions.
The court did not lack jurisdiction over this landlord-tenant appeal due to landlords failure to serve tenants with notice to quit since landlord only sought to recover damages for alleged breaches of the lease and, thus, possession was no longer at issue. The court overruled tenants preliminary objections in part.
Where plaintiffs built a residence in reliance on promises made by the step-father of one of the plaintiffs, the complaint adequately stated claims for declaratory relief, promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment.
Plaintiffs were entitled to net worth discovery to support punitive damages in this dog bite case where they offered a prima facie case that defendants acted in a reckless manner and demonstrated willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others by disregarding their dogs vicious propensity for biting humans. The court granted plaintiffs motion to compel net worth discovery.
District court correctly affirmed the bankruptcy courts holding that bankruptcy trustee was entitled to qualified immunity in appellant lessees claim of eviction.
Respondent was disbarred for repeated professional misconduct in five separate matters that included failing to communicate with clients the basis or rate of his fee before or within a reasonable time.