Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 469, appealed the district court's decision to vacate an arbitration award in favor of appellee StoneMor, Inc.
Appellant appealed his conviction for possessing, soliciting, and receiving child pornography, as well as obstructing a federal investigation, challenging two evidentiary rulings.
Defendant transit authority appealed the court's denial of its post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial in plaintiff bus passenger's personal injury case. The court concluded that its denial of post-trial relief should be affirmed. The court reasoned that defendant was not entitled to assert the jolt and jerk doctrine where plaintiff's theory of negligence focused on an obstruction in the aisle of the bus that she was riding, and not on the fact that the bus driver slammed on the vehicle's brakes.
Court denied student/faculty petition challenging university's disclosure of documents to the U.S. House of Representatives in response to the House's request where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate standing by alleging facts showing that disclosure would put them at risk of threats or harassment. Defendant's motion to dismiss granted.
The court detailed its reasons for granting the petition for appeal of the executrix from the Register's refusal to admit a will executed during the COVID-19 pandemic via DocVerify and determining that the signature on the will affixed by the software program to a virtual document later printed as a hardcopy met the requirements of Pennsylvania law.
The court asked the Superior Court to act appropriately considering the trial court's error in failing to deny defendant doctors' motion for summary judgment.