Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Leeson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 5:23-cv-03668
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract action asserting court lacked jurisdiction over them and they should be treated as separate companies for jurisdictional purposes and court found plaintiff sufficiently stated an alter-ego theory and jurisdictional discovery was necessary. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Retail | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-2462
Court dismissed inmate's pro se § 1983 claims against Home Depot, its employee and police seeking a copy of store surveillance video that he contended proved he did not commit the theft for which he was convicted and court found store and its employee were not state actors and his claims were not cognizable in a §1983 action unless and until his state court robbery conviction was reversed, vacated or otherwise invalidated. Dismissed.
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1283 MDA 2022
Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting in part appellee's habeas corpus motion and dismissing the charge of first-degree murder for lack of prima facie evidence of appellee's specific intent. The court reversed and remanded, holding that evidence of appellee's conduct, including his mid-altercation retrieval of a kitchen knife from inside a home before stabbing his victim in the arm, constituted prima facie evidence of specific intent to kill.
Publication Date: 2024-07-03
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2562
Appellant appealed the district court's judgment in favor of Christine Wormuth and the United States Department of the Army.
Publication Date: 2024-07-02
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2982
Appellant appealed the dismissal of his first amended complaint by the district court.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Carla Garrett, Hayden Trubitt
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-02
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2772
Appellant appealed a district court order denying his motion to file a reply brief related to a motion for reconsideration.
Publication Date: 2024-07-02
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3250
Federal prisoner Saaed Moslem appealed from the district court's dismissal of his breach-of-contract action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the denial of his motion to reconsider.
Publication Date: 2024-07-01
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-1126
Appellant appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants TD Bank, Lenore Gordon, and Keith Nisbet.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Acker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CP-37-JV-84-2023
Commonwealth failed to sustain its burden of demonstrating that a firearm was lawfully seized. Motion to suppress granted.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 002277-CV-2021
Defendant sought post-trial relief after a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on plaintiff's breach of contract and fraud claims. The court denied defendant's post-trial motion, holding that defendant was not entitled to call a court reporter at trial to testify regarding a purported error in a witness's deposition transcript, and that plaintiff was not required to support his claim of document forgery with testimony from a forensic document examiner.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read