Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Defendant school district sought summary judgment on plaintiff student's Title IX retaliation claim. The court granted the motion, holding that plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine issues of material fact regarding her claims that a school official tried to influence her not to report a rumored sexual assault involving another student and that she was removed from the school basketball team for reporting the rumored incident.
Defendants sought dismissal of plaintiff's declaratory relief and damages action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court granted the motion, holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Tax Injunction Act and the principle of comity where plaintiff challenged the state's taxation of its allegedly tax-exempt real property.
Appellant appealed from the orphans' court's order removing him as administrator of his deceased mother's estate and appointing a replacement administratrix. The court affirmed, holding that the orphans' court had subject matter jurisdiction where appellant failed to establish that his absent siblings were indispensable parties to the proceedings, as they had previously renounced their right to administer decedent's estate and appellant identified no other right or interest that required their joinder.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 980 EDA 2023
Police did not require reasonable suspicion or probable cause to search backpack voluntarily discarded by defendant after she fled into a residence that she did not have permission to enter. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings in plaintiffs' action for fraud and related claims arising out of a residential home sale. The court denied both motions where the parties' pleadings created fact issues for resolution by a jury regarding defendant's alleged concealment of defects in the home and the extent of plaintiffs' awareness of the defects prior to closing.
Pro se appellant appealed the dismissal of his claims against certain defendants and the grant of summary judgment in favor of the sole remaining defendant in a civil rights complaint.
Appellants appealed the dismissal of its complaint seeking to enjoin the enforcement of a subpoena issued by the New Jersey Attorney General under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.