Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Petitioner sought review of a final order affirming respondent's decision adopting an administrative law judge's adjudication that denied petitioner's request for an exception to the cap on in-home care hours he could receive from his family. The court affirmed, holding that petitioner failed to demonstrate a burden on his free exercise of religion where he could continue to receive available home care and companion services despite the fact that his mother and sister would no longer be paid for providing more than 60 hours of care pe
The court filed a § 1925(a) opinion in support of its order granting defendant's motion to transfer the venue of this slip and fall case to Montgomery County.
Publication Date: 2024-06-07 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 517 EDA 2023
Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to dismiss pursuant to the prompt trial rule under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013. The court reversed and remanded, holding that appellant did not delay appellee's prosecution on de novo appeal where it merely failed to correct its information to reflect reinstatement of a summary offense that it had voluntarily withdrawn before appellee's municipal court trial.
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's title VII, Americans with Disabilities Act, Pennsylvania Human Relations Act religious, pregnancy and disability discrimination action asserting failure to accommodate and wrongful termination and court found she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as to the disparate impact, disability discrimination and unlawful interference claims but sufficiently established her religious discrimination and sex discrimination claims. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff sought summary judgment in its action to eject defendant from a residential lot after a mortgage foreclosure. The court denied plaintiff's summary judgment motion where fact issues remained as to whether defendant occupied only the single lot identified and claimed by plaintiff, or instead resided upon multiple lots that might be joined and inseparable.
Orphans' court erred in denying church's request for a decree validating the August 2018 and 2019 elections and votes for church trustees and the February 2019 votes removing the pastor because some of orphans' court's findings regarding bylaw and vote requirements were unsupported by competent and adequate evidence of record, its reasoning was internally inconsistent and contradictory, and its interpretation of the bylaws notice provision was ordinarily barred by the rules of construction. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2024-06-07 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 296 EDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on his conviction for second degree murder. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting Commonwealth's evidence of appellant's historical cell phone data where the information was obtained under a 2017 "reasonable grounds" Wiretap Act application that was followed by a second "probable cause" application in light of intervening Supreme Court precedent and Pennsylvania case authority.
Defendant real estate brokerage and real estate agent filed preliminary objections to plaintiff homebuyers' amended complaint. The court overruled the preliminary objections, holding that defendants could not avoid plaintiffs' fraud and related claims at the preliminary objection stage where the crux of plaintiffs' claims was that all named defendants had conspired to conceal the deteriorated condition of the home that plaintiffs purchased.
Bad faith insurance claim failed where plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts of unreasonable conduct by insurer or facts that would support an inference of unreasonableness in the insurer's settlement offer. Defendant's partial motion to dismiss granted.
Appellant appealed the trial court's order concluding that he lacked standing to appeal a zoning board of adjustment's variance approval and quashing his appeal. The court affirmed, holding that appellant, as an individual member of the city council, lacked standing to appeal a decision of the ZBA.