Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Plaintiff's claims against Uber Technologies Inc. for alleged negligent hiring, retention and supervision of a driver who attacked the plaintiff customer did not survive a motion for summary judgment where the complaint did not allege any instances of past misconduct by the offending driver. The court granted in part plaintiff's motion for summary judgment with leave to amend.
The trial court properly found that police demonstrated reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot based in part on information received from an informant who implicated himself in criminal activity when he told police he would drive his son to purchase heroin from two individuals. The appellate court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.
The court lacked jurisdiction to entertain an election contest, because petitioner failed to file a bond within the time provided under the statute. Additionally, petitioner's appeal was untimely.
Publication Date: 2018-08-14 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0952
Trial court abused its discretion in failing to apply unclean hands doctrine to deny husband's petition to modify alimony where husband, an attorney, over the course of several years willfully submitted false documentation and testimony concerning his income. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
The court rejected defendants' argument that it was permanently divested of subject matter jurisdiction of plaintiffs' claims by operation of law where a district court denied plaintiffs' initial motion to remand because the district court's ruling on preemption was not substantive in nature and was ultimately rendered moot. The court recommended affirmance of its order granting plaintiffs' motion to reinstate.
The high court held that substantial portions of a grand jury's report on alleged child sexual abuse by individuals associated with the Pennsylvania Dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church should be released to the public but that the report should be redacted to protect the identities of petitioners/appellants, who were not afforded an opportunity to appear before the grand jury. The high court issued interim relief.
Uniform Planned Community Act did not preclude imposition of common law fiduciary duties upon the community's developers and declarants of the community's association. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Board of immigration appeal's decision that petitioner was convicted of an aggravated felony was remanded because petitioner was convicted of making a false report in violation of 7 U.S.C. §6(b(a)(1)(B) and §13(a)(2). Remanded.
One possessor of land owes no duty of care to another possessor of land under premises liability principles; thus, the trial court did not err in finding that the additional defendant, who leased property together with the plaintiffs, owed no duty of care to them. The appellate court affirmed in part.
Unsolicited fax requesting a recipient verify his or her information in the sender's database did not constitute an advertisement or a pretext for advertisement in violation of the TCPA because the fax did not promote the commercial availability of goods or services to the recipient or public. Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted.