Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The real estate exception to governmental immunity did not apply here, where plaintiffs claimed the minor plaintiff was injured while exiting a school bus but did not suggest that the surface of the school parking lot was defective or that it was not suitable for its intended purpose. The court granted defendants preliminary objection and dismissed plaintiffs complaint.
Plaintiffs, the lawyers of a law firm that served as the Chambersburg Area School Districts solicitor for almost 50 years until their recent termination, sufficiently alleged that political affiliation was not an appropriate requirement for the solicitor position. The court denied in part defendants motion for summary judgment.
Conservatorship hearing, where parties introduced documentary evidence and elicited witness testimony, sufficiently similar to a traditional trial that appellants failure to file post-trial motions resulted in waiver of appellate issues. Order of the trial court affirmed.
In this abuse of process matter, which plaintiffs filed following the dismissal of defendants federal anti-trust case, the court required defendants to produce certain documents under exceptions to the attorney-client privilege.
The court did not have specific personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendants under the states long arm statute where the motor vehicle accident occurred in another state, so it dismissed plaintiffs complaint.
Defendants were entitled to dismissal of plaintiff police officers action alleging violations of his first amendment rights, conspiracy and re-taliation by the solicitor and the borough when solicitor allegedly attempted to prevent him from running for the position of school director by encouraging others to challenge his nomination petition and allegedly influencing promotions in the police department because none of the events constituted materially adverse actions that hindered his campaign and his efforts to portray solicitor as
Trial court properly affirmed the zoning boards grant of a use variance to applicant because objector waived its argument as to applicants standing by not raising it before the board and the record supported the boards finding that applicant proved the required hardship. Affirmed.
Police officer had a reasonable suspicion to stop defendants vehicle, and defendant consented to a chemical blood test, so search warrants were not required. The court denied defendants motions to suppress.
Where purchasers of real property failed to respond to a request for admissions, defendant was entitled to summary judgment as to liability on his breach of contract claims, but not on the issue of damages. The court denied summary judgment on the unjust enrichment, negligence and equitable estoppel counterclaims.
Bank was entitled to dismissal of plaintiffs action alleging that bank negligently and in breach of contract allowed plaintiffs stepson to add his name to the bank account, change the mailing address on the account, deposit checks with forged endorsements and then remove the monies because the gist of the action and the economic loss doctrines barred the negligence counts and the breach of contract count was not sufficiently pled. Motion granted.