By Julie Q. Brush | November 13, 2019
The thought of it for most lawyers gives them a major headache. I'd like to call it something else like "relationship building" or "professional connecting." Because that's what effective networking really is.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Jean-Luc Renault | November 7, 2019
Ever tried pitching a story about something that took place a few days ago, or a trend that's already been covered? It doesn't work out so well.
By Amr Razzak, Stacy Kray and Kelsey Merrick | November 6, 2019
The circumstances under which electronic communications will cross the line from protected free speech to illegal conduct are fact-specific and quickly evolving.
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | November 5, 2019
Most attorneys are aware that the attorney-client privilege is something to be protected with vigilance at all times. For that reason, attorneys may avoid disclosing any client communications to third parties to guard against any suggestion of waiver.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Kate Spelman | November 5, 2019
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) contains an explicit prohibition, along with implicit safe harbors, likely to limit certain Unfair Competition Law and/or Consumer Legal Remedies Act claims related to the use or disclosure of information subject to the CCPA.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Amy S. Park and Aylin Kuzucan | October 25, 2019
The reprieve is a welcome break from the heavy compliance burden that businesses will face, especially for those whose only California personal data relates to business contacts. But is the B2B amendment to be or not to be long term? That is the question.
By Jonathan Jordan | October 25, 2019
Just in time for Halloween, counselor, here's the skinny on sugar.
By Julie Q. Brush | October 23, 2019
Depending which drivers and state of mind are at play, the path to "I do" can be either be smooth sailing or fraught with predicament.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 18, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. Part 1 of this article examines the genesis, purpose, and a leading case interpreting §2019.210. This part reviews two additional cases that interpret §2019.210 and discuss its applications.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 11, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. This article examines the genesis, purpose, and leading cases interpreting §2019.210.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...