The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Jean-Luc Renault | November 7, 2019
Ever tried pitching a story about something that took place a few days ago, or a trend that's already been covered? It doesn't work out so well.
By Amr Razzak, Stacy Kray and Kelsey Merrick | November 6, 2019
The circumstances under which electronic communications will cross the line from protected free speech to illegal conduct are fact-specific and quickly evolving.
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | November 5, 2019
Most attorneys are aware that the attorney-client privilege is something to be protected with vigilance at all times. For that reason, attorneys may avoid disclosing any client communications to third parties to guard against any suggestion of waiver.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Kate Spelman | November 5, 2019
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) contains an explicit prohibition, along with implicit safe harbors, likely to limit certain Unfair Competition Law and/or Consumer Legal Remedies Act claims related to the use or disclosure of information subject to the CCPA.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Amy S. Park and Aylin Kuzucan | October 25, 2019
The reprieve is a welcome break from the heavy compliance burden that businesses will face, especially for those whose only California personal data relates to business contacts. But is the B2B amendment to be or not to be long term? That is the question.
By Jonathan Jordan | October 25, 2019
Just in time for Halloween, counselor, here's the skinny on sugar.
By Julie Q. Brush | October 23, 2019
Depending which drivers and state of mind are at play, the path to "I do" can be either be smooth sailing or fraught with predicament.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 18, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. Part 1 of this article examines the genesis, purpose, and a leading case interpreting §2019.210. This part reviews two additional cases that interpret §2019.210 and discuss its applications.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 11, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. This article examines the genesis, purpose, and leading cases interpreting §2019.210.
By Kevin D. Cardona and Jason E. Fellner | October 9, 2019
Despite the many learning opportunities for newer counsel, few attorneys may realize that the same standard of care applies to the legal representation of pro bono clients as it does with paying clients.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong team that operates with the highest standards of independ...
CAREER OPPORTUNITYUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT - USDC-CT 24-14 POSITION: Pro Se Law Clerk OPENI...