By Ellen Bardash | November 30, 2023
Arnold, who has offices in Sacramento and Woodland Hills, California, claims to have owned the federal service mark "JUSTICE4YOU" since at least 2007 and spent nearly $5.5 million on marketing that used the mark since 2010.
By ALM Staff | November 20, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By ALM Staff | November 13, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Allison Dunn | November 9, 2023
"Plaintiff is therefore forced to resort to an argument that Defendant's facilities—located on the opposite coast—infringe on its trademarks. This sort of significant geographic separation between local businesses, coupled with the lack of any legally cognizable consumer overlap, compels application of the principles espoused in Dawn Donut, What-A-Burger, and their progeny. Plaintiff makes many arguments to the contrary, but they are all unavailing," Young wrote.
By ALM Staff | November 8, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Riley Brennan | November 7, 2023
"While Sabra is not through its display of KVH's Mark advertising that its products were manufactured by KVH, the nature of the Mark that KVH bestows upon products is such that the Mark itself conveys information about the products' origin regarding the production processes that must adhere to strict kosher guidelines, which is certified by KVH. Accordingly, the likelihood of confusion regarding the products' origin is high," U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley of the District of Massachusetts concluded.
By Riley Brennan | November 3, 2023
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
By Adolfo Pesquera | November 1, 2023
"Not a single factor weighs in favor of refusing transfer," Judge Jerry Smith said. "The Western District of Texas contains no relevant evidence, is thousands of miles away from the vast majority of relevant witnesses, and is wholly unconnected to the underlying dispute."
By Mark Sherman | November 1, 2023
Twice in the past six years, the justices have struck down provisions of federal law denying trademarks seen as scandalous or immoral in one case and disparaging in another.
By Jimmy Hoover | November 1, 2023
The justices appeared overwhelmingly against striking down a trademark law that bars registering the name of a living person without his or her consent.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...