By Alaina Lancaster | October 3, 2023
A lawyer from LegalForce RAPC Worldwide argued on behalf of his firm that a Japanese legal technology company's alleged trademark infringement has caused it to lose out on venture capital funds.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Emily Cousins | September 29, 2023
The defendants seek a declaration from the court stating that "it has not infringed Conair['s] trademark, trade dress and slogans, nor committed any acts of unfair competition under the Lanham Act by its advertisement, marketing, promotion, offer for sale and/or sale of authentic and genuine products."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Bridget H. Labutta | September 26, 2023
At the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, the trademark examining attorneys and administrative judges of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are tasked with reviewing trademark applications to ensure that they are in good form and that the applied-for mark is eligible for federal trademark registration.
By ALM Staff | September 22, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Thomas Spigolon | September 19, 2023
The addition of Jonathan Thomas is part of a growth strategy for the Kilpatrick advertising practice throughout the firm's offices, said New York office managing partner Barry Benjamin.
By Adolfo Pesquera | September 18, 2023
After Novoluto filed the applications that led to the asserted patents and launched the first commercial embodiments, the industry saw an influx of devices attempting to capitalize on the innovative technology disclosed, including EIS's Satisfyer Pro 2, the WOW Tech group said in its counterclaims.
By Abigail Adcox | September 15, 2023
A case before the ITC could require additional staffing, potentially allowing law firms to generate more revenue from their IP practice.
By ALM Staff | September 15, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Colleen Murphy | September 14, 2023
"Because the tricolored shape is recognizable as watermelon-flavored, the whole appearance is useful," Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote. "So a candymaker cannot block competitors from using the combined shape and colors by trademarking that combination. We will thus affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment."
By Alaina Lancaster | September 12, 2023
The majority panel refers to Judge Lawrence VanDyke's dissent at least 22 times in a 39-page majority opinion over a fitness brand's personal jurisdiction in California in an underlying trademark dispute with Impossible Foods.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...