By Angela Morris | January 13, 2020
Houston attorney Jim Adler's lawsuits claimed that other lawyers and law firms committed trademark infringement on his well-known nickname, "The Texas Hammer," in mobile-device keyword search advertisements.
By Melanie Dubis, Catherine Lawson and Sloan Carpenter | January 8, 2020
Can the combination of a generic word and a generic website ending like ".com" create something distinctive enough to be trademarked? When does a large company's attempt to reduce confusion with a smaller business' slogan actually result in more confusion?
By Scott Graham | January 3, 2020
Haynes and Boone helped the gaming giant shut down unauthorized sales of Super Smash Brothers Ultimate and many other titles.
By Charles Toutant | December 31, 2019
Gray-market equipment reseller Radwell International seeks a "death knell" for the material differences doctrine, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's "Lexmark" ruling, but the court said material differences jurisprudence remains alive and well after "Lexmark."
By Craig R. Tractenberg | December 27, 2019
Brands are identified by their trademarks. Selecting the right mark, developing it and protecting it becomes essential when the brand is being developed. But trademarks can be lost when the company fails to protect it, or even when the name is so popular that use of the mark cannot be controlled.
Delaware Business Court Insider
By Craig R. Tractenberg | December 27, 2019
Brands are identified by their trademarks. Selecting the right mark, developing it and protecting it becomes essential when the brand is being developed. But trademarks can be lost when the company fails to protect it, or even when the name is so popular that use of the mark cannot be controlled.
By Alaina Lancaster | December 17, 2019
San Francisco-based Emergent Law asserts that "there is no likelihood of confusion" between it and South Carolina-based Emergent Law because of their differing geographic markets and client bases.
By Suzette Parmley | December 9, 2019
The Third Circuit upheld a ruling that a settlement between the DeLorean Motor Co. and its founder's estate precluded a suit seeking back royalties from products using the company's images and logo, such as the hit move "Back to the Future."
By Suzette Parmley | December 9, 2019
The Third Circuit upheld a ruling that a settlement between the DeLorean Motor Co. and its founder's estate precluded a suit seeking back royalties from products using the company's images and logo, such as the hit move "Back to the Future."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Leigh Ann Benson | December 5, 2019
Two competing apparel companies find themselves before the U.S. Supreme Court after an 18-year trademark dispute. They are asking the court to consider the scope of the doctrine of res judicata, which precludes re-litigation of issues and claims that were, or could have been, litigated in a prior case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...